Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1426056 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jethro Beekman <kernel@jbeekman.nl> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-20 01:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-24 10:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 3/3] nvme: Check if drive is locked using ATA Security Jethro Beekman <kernel@jbeekman.nl> - 2016-06-20 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] nvme: Check if drive is locked using ATA Security Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2016-06-24 10:10 +0200
| From | Jethro Beekman <kernel@jbeekman.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 01:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3/3] nvme: Check if drive is locked using ATA Security |
| Message-ID | <rLUat-pE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Signed-off-by: Jethro Beekman <kernel@jbeekman.nl>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index da027ed..0164122 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1389,10 +1389,57 @@ int nvme_security_recv(struct nvme_ctrl *dev, u8 protocol, void *buf,
return nvme_submit_sync_cmd(dev->admin_q, &c, buf, len);
}
+#define OACS_SECURITY (1<<0)
+#define SCSI_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_ATA_SECURITY 0xef
+#define ATA_SECURITY_LOCKED 0x4
+
static bool nvme_security_is_locked(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
struct nvme_id_ctrl *id)
{
- return false;
+ int err;
+ unsigned int i;
+ bool found;
+ u8 protocols[256+8]; /* 8 byte hdr + max number of possible protocols */
+ u8 ata_security[16];
+ u16 n;
+
+ /* security commands supported? */
+ if (!(le16_to_cpu(id->oacs) & OACS_SECURITY))
+ return false;
+
+ /* list security protocols */
+ err = nvme_security_recv(ctrl, 0, protocols, sizeof(protocols));
+ if (err) {
+ dev_warn(ctrl->device, "nvme_security_recv returned error %xh\n",
+ err);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* find ata security protocol */
+ n = be16_to_cpup((__be16 *)(protocols+6));
+ if (n >= 256) {
+ dev_warn(ctrl->device, "security info protocol returned more than 256 protocols\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+ found = false;
+ for (i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
+ if (protocols[8+i] == SCSI_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_ATA_SECURITY) {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!found)
+ return false;
+
+ /* do ata security identify */
+ err = nvme_security_recv(ctrl, SCSI_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_ATA_SECURITY,
+ ata_security, sizeof(ata_security))
+ if (err) {
+ dev_warn(ctrl->device, "nvme_security_recv returned error %xh\n",
+ err);
+ return false;
+ }
+ return ata_security[1] == 0xe && (ata_security[9]&ATA_SECURITY_LOCKED);
}
void nvme_scan_namespaces(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
--
2.9.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-24 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rNulz-5yG-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1426056 |
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 04:06:34PM -0700, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jethro Beekman <kernel@jbeekman.nl>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index da027ed..0164122 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1389,10 +1389,57 @@ int nvme_security_recv(struct nvme_ctrl *dev, u8 protocol, void *buf,
> return nvme_submit_sync_cmd(dev->admin_q, &c, buf, len);
> }
>
> +#define OACS_SECURITY (1<<0)
> +#define SCSI_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_ATA_SECURITY 0xef
> +#define ATA_SECURITY_LOCKED 0x4
It would be great to have this out in a header or maybe rather
headers. OACS_SECURITY should go into nvme.h, we probably should have a
new header for the SCSI security protocols (e.g.
include/scsi/scsi_security.h ?), and I'm not sure what to do with
ATA_SECURITY_LOCKED - maybe just add it to scsi_security.h for now until
we get a more fully blown ata security implementation that even includes
ATA :))
> static bool nvme_security_is_locked(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
> struct nvme_id_ctrl *id)
> {
> - return false;
> + int err;
> + unsigned int i;
> + bool found;
> + u8 protocols[256+8]; /* 8 byte hdr + max number of possible protocols */
Please define a constant for the length in the new scsi_security.h
header.
> + /* find ata security protocol */
> + n = be16_to_cpup((__be16 *)(protocols+6));
Just use get_unaligned_be16 that operates directly on the char
array, similar to how we do in lots of places in the SCSI stack.
> + for (i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
> + if (protocols[8+i] == SCSI_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_ATA_SECURITY) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
I wonder if it might be a good idea to change the structure here a bit
to allow for future other protocols and have each protocol in a helper,
e.g. do something like
for (i = 0; i <= n; i++) {
switch (protocols[8 + i]) {
case SCSI_SECURITY_PROTOCOL_ATA_SECURITY:
locked |= nvme_security_ata_is_locked()
break;
default:
break;
}
> + return ata_security[1] == 0xe && (ata_security[9]&ATA_SECURITY_LOCKED);
Can we have a sumbolic name for the 0xe? Also please always add spaces
around your operators.
But after all this nitpicking the general idea looks fine, thanks a lot
for the patch!
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web