Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1430705 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-24 16:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-01 16:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[patch V3 13/22] timer: Reduce the CPU index space to 256k Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-06-24 16:40 +0200
Re: [patch V3 13/22] timer: Reduce the CPU index space to 256k Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2016-07-01 16:50 +0200
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-24 16:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [patch V3 13/22] timer: Reduce the CPU index space to 256k |
| Message-ID | <rNAr0-NX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
We want to store the array index in the flags space. 256k CPUs should be
enough for a while.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
include/linux/timer.h | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/timer.h
+++ b/include/linux/timer.h
@@ -58,12 +58,12 @@ struct timer_list {
* workqueue locking issues. It's not meant for executing random crap
* with interrupts disabled. Abuse is monitored!
*/
-#define TIMER_CPUMASK 0x0007FFFF
-#define TIMER_MIGRATING 0x00080000
+#define TIMER_CPUMASK 0x0003FFFF
+#define TIMER_MIGRATING 0x00040000
#define TIMER_BASEMASK (TIMER_CPUMASK | TIMER_MIGRATING)
-#define TIMER_DEFERRABLE 0x00100000
-#define TIMER_PINNED 0x00200000
-#define TIMER_IRQSAFE 0x00400000
+#define TIMER_DEFERRABLE 0x00080000
+#define TIMER_PINNED 0x00100000
+#define TIMER_IRQSAFE 0x00200000
#define __TIMER_INITIALIZER(_function, _expires, _data, _flags) { \
.entry = { .next = TIMER_ENTRY_STATIC }, \
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-01 16:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rQ7Vv-7Qe-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1430705 |
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:32:13PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > We want to store the array index in the flags space. 256k CPUs should be > enough for a while. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> For the easy part (Patches 1 to 13): Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Now I'm going to dive in the hard part :-) Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web