Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1423412 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing

Started byGreg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
First post2016-06-15 22:30 +0200
Last post2016-06-21 19:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-15 22:30 +0200
    Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI  probing Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org> - 2016-06-21 19:30 +0200

#1423412 — [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing

FromGreg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-06-15 22:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing
Message-ID<rKpBM-7cb-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
A strange behaviour is observed when comparing PCI hotplug in QEMU, between
x86 and pseries. If you consider the following steps:
- start a VM
- add a PCI device via the QEMU monitor before the rtasd has started (for
  example starting the VM in paused state, or hotplug during FW or boot
  loader)
- resume the VM execution

The x86 kernel detects the PCI device, but the pseries one does not.

This happens because the rtasd kernel worker is currently started under
device_initcall, while PCI probing happens earlier under subsys_initcall.

As a consequence, if we have a pending RTAS event at boot time, a message
is printed and the event is dropped.

This patch moves all the initialization of rtasd to arch_initcall, which is
run before subsys_call: this way, logging_enabled is true when the RTAS
event pops up and it is not lost anymore.

The proc fs bits stay at device_initcall because they cannot be run before
fs_initcall.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
v2: - avoid behaviour change: don't create the proc entry if early init failed

Michael,

This was also tested under PowerVM: it doesn't fix anything there because the
HMC tells it won't honor DLPAR features as long as the RMC isn't here, which
happens later in the boot sequence. It hence seems impossible to have a pending
RTAS event at boot time.

It doesn't seem to break anything either, the kernel boots and hotplug works
okay once the RMC is up.

Cheers.

--
Greg

---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
index e864b7c5884e..a26a02006576 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
@@ -526,10 +526,8 @@ void rtas_cancel_event_scan(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtas_cancel_event_scan);
 
-static int __init rtas_init(void)
+static int __init rtas_event_scan_init(void)
 {
-	struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
-
 	if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
 		return 0;
 
@@ -562,13 +560,27 @@ static int __init rtas_init(void)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
+	start_event_scan();
+
+	return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(rtas_event_scan_init);
+
+static int __init rtas_init(void)
+{
+	struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
+
+	if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!rtas_log_buf)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	entry = proc_create("powerpc/rtas/error_log", S_IRUSR, NULL,
 			    &proc_rtas_log_operations);
 	if (!entry)
 		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create error_log proc entry\n");
 
-	start_event_scan();
-
 	return 0;
 }
 __initcall(rtas_init);

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1427993 — Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing

FromGreg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Date2016-06-21 19:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH v2] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing
Message-ID<rMxES-lN-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1423412
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 22:26:41 +0200
Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> A strange behaviour is observed when comparing PCI hotplug in QEMU, between
> x86 and pseries. If you consider the following steps:
> - start a VM
> - add a PCI device via the QEMU monitor before the rtasd has started (for
>   example starting the VM in paused state, or hotplug during FW or boot
>   loader)
> - resume the VM execution
> 
> The x86 kernel detects the PCI device, but the pseries one does not.
> 
> This happens because the rtasd kernel worker is currently started under
> device_initcall, while PCI probing happens earlier under subsys_initcall.
> 
> As a consequence, if we have a pending RTAS event at boot time, a message
> is printed and the event is dropped.
> 
> This patch moves all the initialization of rtasd to arch_initcall, which is
> run before subsys_call: this way, logging_enabled is true when the RTAS
> event pops up and it is not lost anymore.
> 
> The proc fs bits stay at device_initcall because they cannot be run before
> fs_initcall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> v2: - avoid behaviour change: don't create the proc entry if early init failed
> 

I forgot to mention that Thomas had sent a Tested-by for v1, which I think is
still valid for v2.

> Michael,
> 
> This was also tested under PowerVM: it doesn't fix anything there because the
> HMC tells it won't honor DLPAR features as long as the RMC isn't here, which
> happens later in the boot sequence. It hence seems impossible to have a pending
> RTAS event at boot time.
> 
> It doesn't seem to break anything either, the kernel boots and hotplug works
> okay once the RMC is up.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> --
> Greg
> 
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c |   22 +++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> index e864b7c5884e..a26a02006576 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c
> @@ -526,10 +526,8 @@ void rtas_cancel_event_scan(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtas_cancel_event_scan);
>  
> -static int __init rtas_init(void)
> +static int __init rtas_event_scan_init(void)
>  {
> -	struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> -
>  	if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
>  		return 0;
>  
> @@ -562,13 +560,27 @@ static int __init rtas_init(void)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  	}
>  
> +	start_event_scan();
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(rtas_event_scan_init);
> +
> +static int __init rtas_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct proc_dir_entry *entry;
> +
> +	if (!machine_is(pseries) && !machine_is(chrp))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (!rtas_log_buf)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
>  	entry = proc_create("powerpc/rtas/error_log", S_IRUSR, NULL,
>  			    &proc_rtas_log_operations);
>  	if (!entry)
>  		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create error_log proc entry\n");
>  
> -	start_event_scan();
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  __initcall(rtas_init);
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web