Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1427843 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl  file Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-06-21 16:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> - 2016-06-22 08:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl  file Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> - 2016-06-22 15:10 +0200

#1427843 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Hello Kalle,

On 06/10/2016 03:54 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> writes:
> 
>>> This patch (2/3) is only for code rearrangement and adds an
>>> unnecessary wrapper function. We can simply drop the patch.
>>
>> Agreed.
>>
>> Kalle,
>>
>> Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after dropping patch 2/3.
>> Is that Ok for you or do you want me to re-resend a v3
>> with only patches 1/3 and 3/3?
> 
> I can drop patch 2, no need to resend. Thanks.
> 

I saw that you sent your pull request for v4.8 but the
patches from this series were not included:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/21/400

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1428453 — Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file

Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> writes:

>>> Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after dropping patch 2/3.
>>> Is that Ok for you or do you want me to re-resend a v3
>>> with only patches 1/3 and 3/3?
>> 
>> I can drop patch 2, no need to resend. Thanks.
>> 
>
> I saw that you sent your pull request for v4.8 but the
> patches from this series were not included:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/21/400

I had forgotten to change the state of patches 1 and 3 from 'Changes
Requested' back to 'New' and that's why I missed them. I did that now so
they are back in my queue:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9158855/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9158851/

Thanks for checking.

-- 
Kalle Valo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1428780

Hello Kalle,

On 06/22/2016 02:17 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com> writes:
> 
>>>> Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after dropping patch 2/3.
>>>> Is that Ok for you or do you want me to re-resend a v3
>>>> with only patches 1/3 and 3/3?
>>>
>>> I can drop patch 2, no need to resend. Thanks.
>>>
>>
>> I saw that you sent your pull request for v4.8 but the
>> patches from this series were not included:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/21/400
> 
> I had forgotten to change the state of patches 1 and 3 from 'Changes
> Requested' back to 'New' and that's why I missed them. I did that now so
> they are back in my queue:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9158855/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9158851/
> 
> Thanks for checking.
> 

Ok, thanks for the information.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web