Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1428927 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-22 18:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-22 18:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH net-next 07/14] rxrpc: rxrpc_connection_lock shouldn't be a BH lock, but conn_lock is [ver #2] David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-22 18:10 +0200
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-22 18:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH net-next 07/14] rxrpc: rxrpc_connection_lock shouldn't be a BH lock, but conn_lock is [ver #2] |
| Message-ID | <rMSSZ-5Fj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
rxrpc_connection_lock shouldn't be accessed as a BH-excluding lock. It's
only accessed in a few places and none of those are in BH-context.
rxrpc_transport::conn_lock, however, *is* a BH-excluding lock and should be
accessed so consistently.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/conn_object.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
index 3b42fc4f4fe3..cab2f6dbc5a1 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
@@ -356,9 +356,9 @@ static int rxrpc_connect_exclusive(struct rxrpc_sock *rx,
return ret;
}
- write_lock_bh(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
+ write_lock(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
list_add_tail(&conn->link, &rxrpc_connections);
- write_unlock_bh(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
+ write_unlock(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
spin_lock(&trans->client_lock);
atomic_inc(&trans->usage);
@@ -677,9 +677,9 @@ rxrpc_incoming_connection(struct rxrpc_transport *trans, struct sk_buff *skb)
write_unlock_bh(&trans->conn_lock);
- write_lock_bh(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
+ write_lock(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
list_add_tail(&conn->link, &rxrpc_connections);
- write_unlock_bh(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
+ write_unlock(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
new = "new";
@@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ static void rxrpc_connection_reaper(struct work_struct *work)
now = ktime_get_seconds();
earliest = ULONG_MAX;
- write_lock_bh(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
+ write_lock(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(conn, _p, &rxrpc_connections, link) {
_debug("reap CONN %d { u=%d,t=%ld }",
conn->debug_id, atomic_read(&conn->usage),
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@ static void rxrpc_connection_reaper(struct work_struct *work)
continue;
spin_lock(&conn->trans->client_lock);
- write_lock(&conn->trans->conn_lock);
+ write_lock_bh(&conn->trans->conn_lock);
reap_time = conn->put_time + rxrpc_connection_expiry;
if (atomic_read(&conn->usage) > 0) {
@@ -860,10 +860,10 @@ static void rxrpc_connection_reaper(struct work_struct *work)
earliest = reap_time;
}
- write_unlock(&conn->trans->conn_lock);
+ write_unlock_bh(&conn->trans->conn_lock);
spin_unlock(&conn->trans->client_lock);
}
- write_unlock_bh(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
+ write_unlock(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
if (earliest != ULONG_MAX) {
_debug("reschedule reaper %ld", (long) earliest - now);
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web