Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1426388 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-20 11:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-20 11:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] trace: Introduce an output interface from ftrace to STM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2016-06-20 11:30 +0200
| From | Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] trace: Introduce an output interface from ftrace to STM |
| Message-ID | <rM3GO-6p3-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> This patch is introducing a new function to print Ftrace messages
>> to STM buffer when the traces happen. In order to reduce the
>> effect on timing overhead as much as possible, only the current
>> function and its parent ip address will be recorded into STM in
>> this patch. This idea was first introduced by Philippe Langlais
>> at ST-Microelectronics a long time ago[1].
>
> So why is this useful? The value of trace points is in their payload.
From what I understand, we have no way to log as much information as
Ftrace has done if we want to control the overhead of writing STM in a
limited/acceptable range. Exporting information to STM is much more
time-consuming than writing ring buffer, the thought was simply that
export as much useful information as possible while taking a limited
bytes.
Thanks,
Chunyan
>
>> +#define STM_FTRACE_CHAN 0
>
> This is why we have the stm master/channel allocation policy, which
> should already assign a channel to your stm_source device when it is
> linked to an stm device.
>
> Also, why is this a separate compilation unit from the stm_ftrace.o?
>
>> +
>> +void ftrace_stm_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long ip_array[2] = {ip, parent_ip};
>> +
>> + stm_ftrace_write((char *)ip_array, sizeof(unsigned long) * 2,
>> + STM_FTRACE_CHAN);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ftrace_stm_func);
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output_stm.h b/kernel/trace/trace_output_stm.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..fc3f989
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output_stm.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
>> +#ifndef __TRACE_OUTPUT_STM_H
>> +#define __TRACE_OUTPUT_STM_H
>> +
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_STM_FTRACE
>> +extern void stm_ftrace_write(const char *buf, unsigned int len,
>> + unsigned int chan);
>> +extern void ftrace_stm_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip);
>> +#else
>> +static inline void ftrace_stm_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip) {}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#endif /* __TRACE_OUTPUT_STM_H */
>> --
>> 1.9.1
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web