Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420452 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-13 07:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-18 07:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64 "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-06-13 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64 mpe <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-06-18 07:00 +0200
| From | "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 07:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64 |
| Message-ID | <rJsV3-1Zd-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530 > > > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is > > not yet upstream. > ... > > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2188694 > > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/96514 > > Because of #2 I don't think I can take this directly into the networking > tree, right? > > Therefore, how would you like this to be merged? Hi David, Thanks for asking. Yes, I think it is better to take this through the powerpc tree as all the changes are contained within arch/powerpc, unless Michael Ellerman feels differently. Michael? Regards, Naveen
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | mpe <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-18 07:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rLgwp-7Pu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420452 |
On 2016-06-13 15:40, Naveen N. Rao wrote: > On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530 >> >> > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is >> > not yet upstream. >> ... >> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2188694 >> > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/96514 >> >> Because of #2 I don't think I can take this directly into the >> networking >> tree, right? >> >> Therefore, how would you like this to be merged? > > Hi David, > Thanks for asking. Yes, I think it is better to take this through the > powerpc tree as all the changes are contained within arch/powerpc, > unless Michael Ellerman feels differently. > > Michael? Yeah I was planning to take it. I put it in my test tree last night but it broke the build for some configs. Once that is fixed I'll take it via powerpc#next. cheers
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web