Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1426196 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[RFC 00/12] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200
[RFC 08/12] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked lock Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200
[RFC 09/12] cifs/file.c: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200
[RFC 04/12] lockdep: Make save_trace can copy from other stack_trace Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200
[RFC 07/12] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 00/12] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature |
| Message-ID | <rLZMR-42g-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Crossrelease feature calls a lock which is releasable by a different context from the context having acquired the lock, crosslock. For crosslock, all locks having been held in the context unlocking the crosslock, until eventually the crosslock will be unlocked, have dependency with the crosslock. That's a key idea to implement crossrelease feature. Crossrelease feature introduces 2 new data structures. 1. pend_lock (== plock) This is for keeping locks waiting to commit those so that an actual dependency chain is built, when commiting a crosslock. Every task_struct has an array of this pending lock to keep those locks. These pending locks will be added whenever lock_acquire() is called for normal(non-crosslock) lock and will be flushed(committed) at proper time. 2. cross_lock (== xlock) This keeps some additional data only for crosslock. There is one cross_lock per one lockdep_map for crosslock. lockdep_init_map_crosslock() should be used instead of lockdep_init_map() to use the lock as a crosslock. Acquiring and releasing sequence for crossrelease feature: 1. Acquire All validation check is performed for all locks. 1) For non-crosslock (normal lock) The hlock will be added not only to held_locks of the current's task_struct, but also to pend_lock array of the task_struct, so that a dependency chain can be built with the lock when doing commit. 2) For crosslock The hlock will be added only to the cross_lock of the lock's lockdep_map instead of held_locks, so that a dependency chain can be built with the lock when doing commit. And this lock is added to the xlocks_head list. 2. Commit (only for crosslock) This establishes a dependency chain between the lock unlocking it now and all locks having held in the context unlocking it since the lock was held, even though it tries to avoid building a chain unnecessarily as far as possible. 3. Release 1) For non-crosslock (normal lock) No change. 2) For crosslock Just Remove the lock from xlocks_head list. Release operation should be used with commit operation together for crosslock, in order to build a dependency chain properly. Byungchul Park (12): lockdep: Refactor lookup_chain_cache() lockdep: Add a function building a chain between two hlocks lockdep: Make check_prev_add can use a stack_trace of other context lockdep: Make save_trace can copy from other stack_trace lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature lockdep: Apply crossrelease to completion pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked lock cifs/file.c: Remove trailing white space mm/swap_state.c: Remove trailing white space lockdep: Call lock_acquire(release) when accessing PG_locked manually x86/dumpstack: Optimize save_stack_trace arch/x86/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c | 7 + fs/cifs/file.c | 6 +- include/linux/completion.h | 121 +++++- include/linux/irqflags.h | 16 +- include/linux/lockdep.h | 139 +++++++ include/linux/mm_types.h | 9 + include/linux/pagemap.h | 104 ++++- include/linux/sched.h | 5 + kernel/fork.c | 4 + kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 846 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- kernel/sched/completion.c | 55 +-- lib/Kconfig.debug | 30 ++ mm/filemap.c | 10 +- mm/ksm.c | 1 + mm/migrate.c | 1 + mm/page_alloc.c | 3 + mm/shmem.c | 2 + mm/swap_state.c | 12 +- mm/vmscan.c | 1 + 22 files changed, 1255 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 08/12] lockdep: Apply crossrelease to PG_locked lock |
| Message-ID | <rLZMS-42g-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1426196 |
lock_page() and its family can cause deadlock. Nevertheless, it cannot
use the lock correctness validator becasue unlock_page() can be called
in different context from the context calling lock_page(), which
violates original lockdep's assumption.
However, thanks to CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE, we can apply the lockdep
detector to lock_page() using PG_locked. Applied it.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 9 +++++
include/linux/pagemap.h | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++++
mm/filemap.c | 4 +-
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++
5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 624b78b..ab33ee3 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
#include <asm/page.h>
#include <asm/mmu.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#endif
+
#ifndef AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH
#define AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH 0
#endif
@@ -215,6 +219,11 @@ struct page {
#ifdef LAST_CPUPID_NOT_IN_PAGE_FLAGS
int _last_cpupid;
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
+ struct lockdep_map map;
+ struct cross_lock xlock;
+#endif
}
/*
* The struct page can be forced to be double word aligned so that atomic ops
diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
index c0049d9..2fc4af1 100644
--- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
+++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h> /* for in_interrupt() */
#include <linux/hugetlb_inline.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
+#include <linux/lockdep.h>
+#endif
/*
* Bits in mapping->flags. The lower __GFP_BITS_SHIFT bits are the page
@@ -441,26 +444,81 @@ static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
return pgoff >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
+#define lock_page_init(p) \
+do { \
+ static struct lock_class_key __key; \
+ lockdep_init_map_crosslock(&(p)->map, &(p)->xlock, \
+ "(PG_locked)" #p, &__key, 0); \
+} while (0)
+
+static inline void lock_page_acquire(struct page *page, int try)
+{
+ page = compound_head(page);
+ lock_acquire_exclusive(&page->map, 0, try, NULL, _RET_IP_);
+}
+
+static inline void lock_page_release(struct page *page)
+{
+ page = compound_head(page);
+ /*
+ * Calling lock_commit_crosslock() is necessary
+ * for cross-releasable lock when the lock is
+ * releasing before calling lock_release().
+ */
+ lock_commit_crosslock(&page->map);
+ lock_release(&page->map, 0, _RET_IP_);
+}
+#else
+static inline void lock_page_init(struct page *page) {}
+static inline void lock_page_free(struct page *page) {}
+static inline void lock_page_acquire(struct page *page, int try) {}
+static inline void lock_page_release(struct page *page) {}
+#endif
+
extern void __lock_page(struct page *page);
extern int __lock_page_killable(struct page *page);
extern int __lock_page_or_retry(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned int flags);
-extern void unlock_page(struct page *page);
+extern void do_raw_unlock_page(struct page *page);
-static inline int trylock_page(struct page *page)
+static inline void unlock_page(struct page *page)
+{
+ lock_page_release(page);
+ do_raw_unlock_page(page);
+}
+
+static inline int do_raw_trylock_page(struct page *page)
{
page = compound_head(page);
return (likely(!test_and_set_bit_lock(PG_locked, &page->flags)));
}
+static inline int trylock_page(struct page *page)
+{
+ if (do_raw_trylock_page(page)) {
+ lock_page_acquire(page, 1);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* lock_page may only be called if we have the page's inode pinned.
*/
static inline void lock_page(struct page *page)
{
might_sleep();
- if (!trylock_page(page))
+
+ if (!do_raw_trylock_page(page))
__lock_page(page);
+ /*
+ * The acquire function must be after actual lock operation
+ * for crossrelease lock, because the lock instance is
+ * searched by release operation in any context and more
+ * than two instances acquired make it confused.
+ */
+ lock_page_acquire(page, 0);
}
/*
@@ -470,9 +528,22 @@ static inline void lock_page(struct page *page)
*/
static inline int lock_page_killable(struct page *page)
{
+ int ret;
+
might_sleep();
- if (!trylock_page(page))
- return __lock_page_killable(page);
+
+ if (!do_raw_trylock_page(page)) {
+ ret = __lock_page_killable(page);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ /*
+ * The acquire function must be after actual lock operation
+ * for crossrelease lock, because the lock instance is
+ * searched by release operation in any context and more
+ * than two instances acquired make it confused.
+ */
+ lock_page_acquire(page, 0);
return 0;
}
@@ -487,7 +558,19 @@ static inline int lock_page_or_retry(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned int flags)
{
might_sleep();
- return trylock_page(page) || __lock_page_or_retry(page, mm, flags);
+
+ if (do_raw_trylock_page(page) || __lock_page_or_retry(page, mm, flags)) {
+ /*
+ * The acquire function must be after actual lock operation
+ * for crossrelease lock, because the lock instance is
+ * searched by release operation in any context and more
+ * than two instances acquired make it confused.
+ */
+ lock_page_acquire(page, 0);
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index dd314d3..73942b5 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1024,6 +1024,15 @@ config LOCKDEP_COMPLETE
A deadlock caused by wait and complete can be detected by lockdep
using crossrelease feature.
+config LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
+ bool "Lock debugging: allow PG_locked lock to use deadlock detector"
+ select LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
+ default n
+ help
+ PG_locked lock is a kind of cross-released lock. This makes
+ PG_locked lock possible to use deadlock detector, using
+ crossrelease feature.
+
config PROVE_LOCKING
bool "Lock debugging: prove locking correctness"
depends on DEBUG_KERNEL && TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && STACKTRACE_SUPPORT && LOCKDEP_SUPPORT
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 3461d97..47fc5c0 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(add_page_wait_queue);
* The mb is necessary to enforce ordering between the clear_bit and the read
* of the waitqueue (to avoid SMP races with a parallel wait_on_page_locked()).
*/
-void unlock_page(struct page *page)
+void do_raw_unlock_page(struct page *page)
{
page = compound_head(page);
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageLocked(page), page);
@@ -822,7 +822,7 @@ void unlock_page(struct page *page)
smp_mb__after_atomic();
wake_up_page(page, PG_locked);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_page);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(do_raw_unlock_page);
/**
* end_page_writeback - end writeback against a page
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 838ca8bb..17ed9a8 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4538,6 +4538,9 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
} else {
__init_single_pfn(pfn, zone, nid);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP_PAGELOCK
+ lock_page_init(pfn_to_page(pfn));
+#endif
}
}
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 09/12] cifs/file.c: Remove trailing white space |
| Message-ID | <rLZMS-42g-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1426196 |
Trailing white space is not accepted in kernel coding style. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> --- fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c index ff882ae..bcf9ead 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -3851,7 +3851,7 @@ void cifs_oplock_break(struct work_struct *work) * In the non-cached mode (mount with cache=none), we shunt off direct read and write requests * so this method should never be called. * - * Direct IO is not yet supported in the cached mode. + * Direct IO is not yet supported in the cached mode. */ static ssize_t cifs_direct_io(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t pos) -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 04/12] lockdep: Make save_trace can copy from other stack_trace |
| Message-ID | <rLZMS-42g-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1426196 |
Currently, save_trace() can only save current context's stack trace.
However, it would be useful if it can save(copy from) another context's
stack trace. Especially, it can be used by crossrelease feature.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index c596bef..b03014b 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void print_lockdep_off(const char *bug_msg)
#endif
}
-static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
+static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, struct stack_trace *copy)
{
trace->nr_entries = 0;
trace->max_entries = MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES - nr_stack_trace_entries;
@@ -397,7 +397,13 @@ static int save_trace(struct stack_trace *trace)
trace->skip = 3;
- save_stack_trace(trace);
+ if (copy) {
+ trace->nr_entries = min(copy->nr_entries, trace->max_entries);
+ trace->skip = copy->skip;
+ memcpy(trace->entries, copy->entries,
+ trace->nr_entries * sizeof(unsigned long));
+ } else
+ save_stack_trace(trace);
/*
* Some daft arches put -1 at the end to indicate its a full trace.
@@ -1201,7 +1207,7 @@ static noinline int print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this,
if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
return 0;
- if (!save_trace(&this->trace))
+ if (!save_trace(&this->trace, NULL))
return 0;
depth = get_lock_depth(target);
@@ -1547,13 +1553,13 @@ print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
printk("\nthe dependencies between %s-irq-safe lock", irqclass);
printk(" and the holding lock:\n");
- if (!save_trace(&prev_root->trace))
+ if (!save_trace(&prev_root->trace, NULL))
return 0;
print_shortest_lock_dependencies(backwards_entry, prev_root);
printk("\nthe dependencies between the lock to be acquired");
printk(" and %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass);
- if (!save_trace(&next_root->trace))
+ if (!save_trace(&next_root->trace, NULL))
return 0;
print_shortest_lock_dependencies(forwards_entry, next_root);
@@ -1885,7 +1891,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
}
if (!own_trace && stack_saved && !*stack_saved) {
- if (!save_trace(&trace))
+ if (!save_trace(&trace, NULL))
return 0;
*stack_saved = 1;
}
@@ -2436,7 +2442,7 @@ print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr,
lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);
printk("\nthe shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock:\n");
- if (!save_trace(&root->trace))
+ if (!save_trace(&root->trace, NULL))
return 0;
print_shortest_lock_dependencies(other, root);
@@ -3015,7 +3021,7 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
hlock_class(this)->usage_mask |= new_mask;
- if (!save_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + new_bit))
+ if (!save_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + new_bit, NULL))
return 0;
switch (new_bit) {
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-20 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [RFC 07/12] pagemap.h: Remove trailing white space |
| Message-ID | <rLZMS-42g-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1426196 |
Trailing white space is not accepted in kernel coding style. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> --- include/linux/pagemap.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h index 92395a0..c0049d9 100644 --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_page(struct page *page, int bit) __wake_up_bit(page_waitqueue(page), &page->flags, bit); } -/* +/* * Wait for a page to be unlocked. * * This must be called with the caller "holding" the page, @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static inline void wait_on_page_locked(struct page *page) wait_on_page_bit(compound_head(page), PG_locked); } -/* +/* * Wait for a page to complete writeback */ static inline void wait_on_page_writeback(struct page *page) -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web