Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420272 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-12 15:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-13 10:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: general preparation for NVMe over Fabrics support Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-06-12 15:40 +0200
Re: general preparation for NVMe over Fabrics support Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> - 2016-06-13 10:10 +0200
| From | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-12 15:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: general preparation for NVMe over Fabrics support |
| Message-ID | <rJdMm-Nl-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Jun 09 2016, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:20:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This patch set adds some needed preparations for the upcoming NVMe over > > Fabrics support. > > > > Contains: > > - Allow transfer size limitations for NVMe transports > > - Add the get_log_page command definition required by the NVMe target > > - more helpers in core code that can be used by various transports > > - add some missing constants and identify attributes > > This series looks good. > > Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@inte.com> Added 1-8, 9/10 throws a lot of rejects and it's pre-coffee here. What is this against? I corrected your email, unless you joined a hot new startup called Inte. > For patch ordering, I had thought there were no issues with these > I submitted: > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-May/004704.html This looks fine for 4.7. > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-May/004709.html This one is a bit involved... -- Jens Axboe
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJv6x-3AX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420272 |
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:33:18AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > Added 1-8, 9/10 throws a lot of rejects and it's pre-coffee here. What > is this against? This was against 4.7-rc2 I think. But you already merged 9 and 10 in slightly different versions, so we should be fine.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web