Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420188 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-12 09:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-14 12:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-06-12 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-06-13 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> - 2016-06-14 12:20 +0200
| From | Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-12 09:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa |
| Message-ID | <rJ7QB-5EP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Will, On 2016/6/7 21:58, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:08:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> v3 -> v4: >> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8. >> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64. >> >> v2 -> v3: >> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the >> patches looks more well. The final code have no change. >> >> v1 -> v2: >> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679 > If you want bug fixes to land in 4.7, you'll need to base them on a > mainline kernel. > Rafael queued ARM64 ACPI NUMA support for 4.8, and this patch set is based on that with no urgent bugfixes, can this patch set be queued for 4.8? Thanks Hanjun
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJx8l-4UA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420188 |
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:09:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2016/6/7 21:58, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:08:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: > >> v3 -> v4: > >> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8. > >> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64. > >> > >> v2 -> v3: > >> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the > >> patches looks more well. The final code have no change. > >> > >> v1 -> v2: > >> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679 > > If you want bug fixes to land in 4.7, you'll need to base them on a > > mainline kernel. > > > > Rafael queued ARM64 ACPI NUMA support for 4.8, and this patch set is based > on that with no urgent bugfixes, can this patch set be queued for 4.8? Up to Catalin, since he's handling the 4.8 merge window. It would be really nice if you could give us the heads up about dependencies like this in the future, preferably *before* the base part has already been merged. That way, it's easier to create shared topic branches and gives us more options if we think that conflicts are likely to occur. Will
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-14 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJTBT-3uB-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420680 |
On 2016/6/13 18:12, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:09:46PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: >> On 2016/6/7 21:58, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 04:08:04PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >>>> v3 -> v4: >>>> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8. >>>> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64. >>>> >>>> v2 -> v3: >>>> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the >>>> patches looks more well. The final code have no change. >>>> >>>> v1 -> v2: >>>> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679 >>> If you want bug fixes to land in 4.7, you'll need to base them on a >>> mainline kernel. >>> >> Rafael queued ARM64 ACPI NUMA support for 4.8, and this patch set is based >> on that with no urgent bugfixes, can this patch set be queued for 4.8? > Up to Catalin, since he's handling the 4.8 merge window. It would be really > nice if you could give us the heads up about dependencies like this in the > future, preferably *before* the base part has already been merged. That way, > it's easier to create shared topic branches and gives us more options if > we think that conflicts are likely to occur. Understood the maintenance difficulty will have, will do that next time. Much appreciate if it can be merged for 4.8. Thanks Hanjun
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web