Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1420302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-12 19:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-13 22:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 10 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2016-06-12 19:40 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-06-13 10:10 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2016-06-13 10:30 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> - 2016-06-13 13:00 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-06-13 13:10 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> - 2016-06-13 14:00 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-13 15:50 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-06-13 16:00 +0200
Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-13 22:40 +0200
| From | Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-12 19:40 +0200 |
| Subject | 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7 |
| Message-ID | <rJhwB-36U-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi! As announced last week in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2233992 I'll try to write regression reports for 4.7. Find the first one below. Obviously it looks a bit differently then those that Rafael wrote in the past. And I didn't automatically send out mails to the persons involved. But well, you have to start somewhere and it's better than nothing afaics. I'll manually send mails where I think a poke is needed to get things rolling again (those contain a "todo-knurd:" in the note as small reminder for myself). Let me know if a regression in missing in the list. Or if there is something on the list which shouldn't be there. Right now it contains 21 entries. HTH, CU, knurd ---- Description: ath10k no longer authenticates and freezes system Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119151 Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/152513/focus=152535 Date repo/stat: 2016-05-27 / 2016-06-02 Notes: forgotten? or is this related to http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/152112/focus=152511 ? Description: Commit 51e68d055cba (x86 isa: add back X86_32 dependency on CONFIG_ISA), added to restrict the ISA bus driver to only X86_32, causes several drivers intended for X86_64 to be restricted to X86_32 as well. Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/ Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.gpio/17016/focus=2231443 Date repo/stat: 2016-05-28 / 2016-05-31 Notes: got lost? (todo-knurd: poke the right people) Description: Bad flicker on skylake HQD due to code in the 4.7 merge window Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2230377 Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2230377/focus=90911 Date repo/stat: 2016-05-30 / 2016-05-30 Notes: unknown; reporter is a developer, no assistance needed afaics Description: Qemu CD ROM emulation stopped working Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/113900 Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/114282/focus=2241548 Date repo/stat: 2016-05-31 / 2016-06-11 Notes: under discussion Description: Dedicated wakeirqs may not work on omaps for the first resume Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119341 Latest status: n/a Date repo/stat: 2016-05-31 / n/a Notes: Really a regression? Reporter is a developer, no assistance needed afaics Description: we noticed reaim.jobs_per_min -49.1% regression Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2231025/ Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2231025/focus=2233571 Date repo/stat: 2016-05-31 / 2016-06-02 Notes: current status unknown Description: ASUS Q500A: corrupted keycodes on dualboot system Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119391 Latest status: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119391#c15 Date repo/stat: 2016-05-31 / 2016-06-12 Notes: in progress Description: xhci: fix platform quirks overwrite regression in 4.7-rc1 Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/142949/focus=142952 Latest status: n/a Date repo/stat: 2016-06-01 / n/a Notes: got lost? (todo-knurd: poke the right people) Description: NULL pointer dereference with BCM4350 wireless device Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119451 Latest status: 7.6. Date repo/stat: 2016-06-01 / 2016-06-07 Notes: likely fixed in mainline by https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/31143e2933 Description: Asus keyboard backlight broken, /sys/class/leds/asus::kbd_backlight gone Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119531 Latest status: n/a Date repo/stat: 2016-06-02 / n/a Notes: help reporter to get in contact with the right people (todo-knurd) Description: 795ae7a0de: pixz.throughput -9.1% regression Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2233056/ Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2233056/focus=2238208 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-02 / 2016-06-08 Notes: wip Description: IPoIB lock inversion complaint Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119561 Latest status: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119561#c2 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-02 / 2016-06-02 Notes: might be fixed already Description: RadeonSI get a huge performance dip with used with the nine state tracker Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119631 Latest status: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119631#c3 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-04 / 2016-06-07 Notes: waiting for feedback from reporter Description: rtl8188eu driver from staging has regressed after the staging 4.7-rc1 pull-req Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.driver-project.devel/89186 Latest status: n/a Date repo/stat: 2016-06-05 / n/a Notes: got lost? (todo-knurd: poke the right people) Description: [lkp] [mm] 5c0a85fad9: unixbench.score -6.3% regression Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2235794 Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2235794/focus=2241602 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-06 / 2016-06-12 Notes: wip Description: System hang possibly due to brcmfmac regression Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119761 Latest status: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119761#c1 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-07 / 2016-06-12 Notes: told reporter to check if its a dup of https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119451 which liekly is fixed Description: mmc_select_hs200() regression in v4.7-rc. Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2237440 Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2237440/focus=2238598 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-07 / 2016-06-08 Notes: wip Description: Regression in kbuild: fix if_change and friends to consider argument Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kbuild.devel/14981/ Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kbuild.devel/14981/focus=15000 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-07 / 2016-06-09 Notes: wip Description: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code] when using a USB Mass Storage device Report: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/143504 Latest status: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.usb.general/143504/focus=153011 Date repo/stat: 2016-06-09 / 2016-06-09 Notes: likely fixed in mainline Description: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference in drm_connector_cleanup nouveau when Xorg server is started Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119861 Latest status: n/a Date repo/stat: 2016-06-09 / n/a Notes: if nothing happens in the next few days send reporter to freedesktop.org, as that's afaics what the nouveau developers use (todo-knurd) Description: Notebook Clevo N350DW i5-6500T freezes on shutdown (but reboots fine) Report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119871 Latest status: n/a Date repo/stat: 2016-06-09 / n/a Notes: reporter needs assistance, as more details are needed to get this debugged
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJv6y-3AX-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420302 |
Hey thl,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:22:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi! As announced last week in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2233992
> I'll try to write regression reports for 4.7. Find the first one below.
looks good, thanks for volunteering.
So I'm wondering, would it make more sense to have a web page somewhere
which carries all those and gets updated when status ot any tracked
regression changes?
So that people can look at it and get the latest on the regressions
front instead of trying to find a possibly outdated mail to lkml?
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJvpU-3Ie-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420573 |
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:07:48 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Hey thl, > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:22:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Hi! As announced last week in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2233992 > > I'll try to write regression reports for 4.7. Find the first one below. > > looks good, thanks for volunteering. Indeed, it's really appreciated! > So I'm wondering, would it make more sense to have a web page somewhere > which carries all those and gets updated when status ot any tracked > regression changes? > > So that people can look at it and get the latest on the regressions > front instead of trying to find a possibly outdated mail to lkml? Another idea is to use "Keywords" or "Tags" field in each bugzilla entry. Then you can let bugzilla showing up the all such entries. Takashi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJxL3-5aM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420588 |
Takashi Iwai wrote on 13.06.2016 10:20: > On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:07:48 +0200, > Borislav Petkov wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 07:22:17PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> > Hi! As announced last week in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2233992 >> > I'll try to write regression reports for 4.7. Find the first one below. >> looks good, thanks for volunteering. > Indeed, it's really appreciated! thx! >> So I'm wondering, would it make more sense to have a web page somewhere >> which carries all those and gets updated when status ot any tracked >> regression changes? Yeah, that would be the good approach, but that would take some time and work to set up. > Another idea is to use "Keywords" or "Tags" field in each bugzilla > entry. Then you can let bugzilla showing up the all such entries. Which would mean that all regressions need to get an entry in bugzilla.kernel.org. I'm not sure if that's a wise approach, as some developers/subsystems don't use it afaics: some use other bug trackers, others just use mailing lists and might not be too happy if they'd have to deal with bugzilla. Obviously I could file tracking bugs in our bugzilla. But I wonder if that is worth the work; and it could lead to confusion once a regression reporter puts some crucial information into the tracking bug entry instead of posting it to the proper place where the developers discuss the problem. CU, knurd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJxUJ-5uh-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420716 |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> and it could lead to confusion once a regression reporter puts some
> crucial information into the tracking bug entry instead of posting it
> to the proper place where the developers discuss the problem.
Right, this is where a single webpage would help when collecting all the
relevant data/links for a regression, regardless of the bugtracker.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJyH8-5Np-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420720 |
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:02:21 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > and it could lead to confusion once a regression reporter puts some > > crucial information into the tracking bug entry instead of posting it > > to the proper place where the developers discuss the problem. > > Right, this is where a single webpage would help when collecting all the > relevant data/links for a regression, regardless of the bugtracker. Well, Rafael created a bugzilla entry for tracking in the past, so using bugzilla as tracking tool works in general. It doesn't mean it's the best option, of course, though. In anyway, the only question is whether Thorsten feels comfortable or not. thanks, Takashi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 15:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJAfT-6Tq-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420751 |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Well, Rafael created a bugzilla entry for tracking in the past, so
> using bugzilla as tracking tool works in general. It doesn't mean
> it's the best option, of course, though.
So I don't care whether it is buzgilla or some other central place which
can show you all regressions at once and Thorsten can edit it quickly so
that interested parties can get the latest status of a regression and
not waste time with stale emails.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJApB-6Xi-47@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420840 |
On Monday, June 13, 2016 03:36:48 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 01:53:34PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Well, Rafael created a bugzilla entry for tracking in the past, so > > using bugzilla as tracking tool works in general. It doesn't mean > > it's the best option, of course, though. > > So I don't care whether it is buzgilla or some other central place which > can show you all regressions at once and Thorsten can edit it quickly so > that interested parties can get the latest status of a regression and > not waste time with stale emails. I used kernel BZ entries for two reasons. First, some of the bugs were in the kernel BZ already, so they could be added to the tracked list very easily when it was in BZ itself. Second, some people actually used BZ entries created by me to work on the bugs going forward (for storing logs, acpidumps and similar). Thanks, Rafael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJAzl-72E-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420862 |
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:53:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> I used kernel BZ entries for two reasons.
>
> First, some of the bugs were in the kernel BZ already, so they could be added
> to the tracked list very easily when it was in BZ itself. Second, some people
> actually used BZ entries created by me to work on the bugs going forward (for
> storing logs, acpidumps and similar).
Could be useful too, especially if we mark all entries with some keyword
like "regression" or somesuch and then search for it to geget all
regressions.
@Thorsten: well, if you do use bugzilla, you have everything there and
ready to use :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-13 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rJGOm-2R5-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1420877 |
On Monday, June 13, 2016 03:53:35 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 03:53:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I used kernel BZ entries for two reasons. > > > > First, some of the bugs were in the kernel BZ already, so they could be added > > to the tracked list very easily when it was in BZ itself. Second, some people > > actually used BZ entries created by me to work on the bugs going forward (for > > storing logs, acpidumps and similar). > > Could be useful too, especially if we mark all entries with some keyword > like "regression" or somesuch and then search for it to geget all > regressions. There is a "regression" flag in the kernel BZ already. Guess why. ;-) > @Thorsten: well, if you do use bugzilla, you have everything there and > ready to use :) I may be able to find some scripts I used with that a few years ago (although they aren't pretty). Thanks, Rafael
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web