Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1419942 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-11 09:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-11 09:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: possible new false positive in checkpatch Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com> - 2016-06-11 09:40 +0200
| From | Tal Shorer <tal.shorer@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-11 09:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: possible new false positive in checkpatch |
| Message-ID | <rILGp-6w-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 05:50:40PM +0300, Tal Shorer wrote: > >> > Yes it feels like that should be eliding them completely, and likely any >> > following space as well, something like this: >> > >> > $s =~ s/$;+\s*//g; >> > $c =~ s/$;+\s*//g; >> > >> Replacing the problematic lines with these fixes the issue. >> > > Introduced in commit 9f5af480f4554aac12e002b6f5c2b04895857700: >> > > checkpatch: improve SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT test >> > > Commenting out these lines removes the warning. >> > > >> > > This pattern exists in many places around the kernel source. >> > > Is this the intended behavior? >> > >> > Seems wrong to me. >> > >> > -apw >> >> Which git tree is checkpatch developed in? Linus's? > > Yeah in Linus' tree. > > -apw This still isn't fixed. Should I submit Andy's change myself? Feels like plagiarize.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web