Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1415886 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl6040: Handle mclk used for HPPLL and optional internal clock source

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl6040: Handle mclk used for HPPLL and optional  internal clock source Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2016-06-07 11:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl6040: Handle mclk used for HPPLL and optional  internal clock source Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-06-07 11:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl6040: Handle mclk used for HPPLL and optional  internal clock source Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> - 2016-06-07 11:30 +0200

#1415886 — Re: [PATCH] mfd: twl6040: Handle mclk used for HPPLL and optional internal clock source

Lee,

On 05/16/16 18:02, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:13:29PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On some boards, like omap5-uevm the MCLK is gated by default and in order
>> to be able to use the High performance modes of twl6040 it need to be
>> enabled by SW.
>> Add support for handling the MCLK source clock via CCF.
>> At the same time lover the print priority of the notification that the 32K
>> clock is not proveded so it is not going to be handled by the driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt |  4 +--
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Can you take a look at this patch if it is OK to pick?

>>  drivers/mfd/twl6040.c                             | 34 +++++++++++++++++------
>>  include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h                       |  3 +-
>>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


Thanks,
Péter

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1415904

On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:

> Lee,
> 
> On 05/16/16 18:02, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:13:29PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On some boards, like omap5-uevm the MCLK is gated by default and in order
> >> to be able to use the High performance modes of twl6040 it need to be
> >> enabled by SW.
> >> Add support for handling the MCLK source clock via CCF.
> >> At the same time lover the print priority of the notification that the 32K
> >> clock is not proveded so it is not going to be handled by the driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt |  4 +--
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 
> Can you take a look at this patch if it is OK to pick?

Yes, when I get around to it.

I currently have 75 patch review to conduct in my inbox.  Some of them
are quite large and complex.  They will be seen to in the order they
were sent, and you just bumped this patch to "sent today". ;)

> >>  drivers/mfd/twl6040.c                             | 34 +++++++++++++++++------
> >>  include/linux/mfd/twl6040.h                       |  3 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Péter

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1415923

On 06/07/16 12:17, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> 
>> Lee,
>>
>> On 05/16/16 18:02, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:13:29PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>>> On some boards, like omap5-uevm the MCLK is gated by default and in order
>>>> to be able to use the High performance modes of twl6040 it need to be
>>>> enabled by SW.
>>>> Add support for handling the MCLK source clock via CCF.
>>>> At the same time lover the print priority of the notification that the 32K
>>>> clock is not proveded so it is not going to be handled by the driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/twl6040.txt |  4 +--
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>>
>> Can you take a look at this patch if it is OK to pick?
> 
> Yes, when I get around to it.
> 
> I currently have 75 patch review to conduct in my inbox.  Some of them
> are quite large and complex.  They will be seen to in the order they
> were sent, and you just bumped this patch to "sent today". ;)

I'm sorry for this. I did not intended to interfere with your workflow. I will
be more patient next time, it is hard to know if I should bump the thread or
resend or wait.

Sorry again,
Péter

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web