Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1414889 > unrolled thread

[BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done

Started byTaeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
First post2016-06-06 13:00 +0200
Last post2016-06-07 09:50 +0200
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 13:00 +0200
    Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is  failed, finally free a config set after it is done Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-06-06 22:30 +0200
      Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is  failed, finally free a config set after it is done Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2016-06-06 23:40 +0200
        Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is  failed, finally free a config set after it is done Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 09:50 +0200

#1414889 — [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done

FromTaeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-06 13:00 +0200
Subject[BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done
Message-ID<rH0qe-3MT-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
Because of die() at perf_parse_file() a config set was freed
in collect_config(), if failed.
But it is natural to free a config set after collect_config() is done
when some problems happened.

So, in case of failure, lastly free a config set at perf_config_set__new()
instead of freeing the config set in collect_config().

Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/config.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
index b500737..d013f90 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
@@ -639,7 +639,6 @@ static int collect_config(const char *var, const char *value,
 
 out_free:
 	free(key);
-	perf_config_set__delete(set);
 	return -1;
 }
 
@@ -649,7 +648,8 @@ struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void)
 
 	if (set) {
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
-		perf_config(collect_config, set);
+		if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0)
+			perf_config_set__delete(set);
 	}
 
 	return set;
-- 
2.5.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1415418 — Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done

FromArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date2016-06-06 22:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done
Message-ID<rH9jP-1cX-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1414889
Em Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:52:53PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> Because of die() at perf_parse_file() a config set was freed
> in collect_config(), if failed.
> But it is natural to free a config set after collect_config() is done
> when some problems happened.
> 
> So, in case of failure, lastly free a config set at perf_config_set__new()
> instead of freeing the config set in collect_config().
> 
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/config.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
> index b500737..d013f90 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
> @@ -639,7 +639,6 @@ static int collect_config(const char *var, const char *value,
>  
>  out_free:
>  	free(key);
> -	perf_config_set__delete(set);
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> @@ -649,7 +648,8 @@ struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void)
>  
>  	if (set) {
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
> -		perf_config(collect_config, set);
> +		if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0)
> +			perf_config_set__delete(set);
>  	}
>  
>  	return set;

You can't do that, there is something missing, without looking at the
code I think you need:

 	if (set) {
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
-		perf_config(collect_config, set);
+		if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0) {
+			perf_config_set__delete(set);
+			set = NULL;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return set;

No?

- Arnaldo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1415493 — Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done

FromTaeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-06 23:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done
Message-ID<rHapA-1UM-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1415418

On 06/07/2016 05:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:52:53PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> Because of die() at perf_parse_file() a config set was freed
>> in collect_config(), if failed.
>> But it is natural to free a config set after collect_config() is done
>> when some problems happened.
>>
>> So, in case of failure, lastly free a config set at perf_config_set__new()
>> instead of freeing the config set in collect_config().
>>
>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/util/config.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
>> index b500737..d013f90 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
>> @@ -639,7 +639,6 @@ static int collect_config(const char *var, const char *value,
>>
>>   out_free:
>>   	free(key);
>> -	perf_config_set__delete(set);
>>   	return -1;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -649,7 +648,8 @@ struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void)
>>
>>   	if (set) {
>>   		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
>> -		perf_config(collect_config, set);
>> +		if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0)
>> +			perf_config_set__delete(set);
>>   	}
>>
>>   	return set;
>
> You can't do that, there is something missing, without looking at the
> code I think you need:
>
>   	if (set) {
>   		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
> -		perf_config(collect_config, set);
> +		if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0) {
> +			perf_config_set__delete(set);
> +			set = NULL;
> +		}
>   	}
>
>   	return set;
>
> No?
>

Granted
Sorry for missing above..

I modified using 'return NULL;' instead of 'set = NULL;' as below

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
index c73f1c4..cb749d3 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
@@ -643,7 +643,6 @@ static int collect_config(const char *var, const 
char *value,

  out_free:
          free(key);
-        perf_config_set__delete(set);
          return -1;
  }

@@ -653,7 +652,10 @@ struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void)

          if (set) {
                  INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
-                perf_config(collect_config, set);
+                if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0) {
+                        perf_config_set__delete(set);
+                        return NULL;
+                }
          }

          return set;

Because in near future, perf_config_set__delete() will use zfree().

will send changed this patch soon !
Thank you for your review :)

Taeung

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1415801 — Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done

FromTaeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-07 09:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [BUGFIX][PATCH v6 2/9] perf config: If collect_config() is failed, finally free a config set after it is done
Message-ID<rHjVT-8cE-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1415493

On 06/07/2016 06:37 AM, Taeung Song wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2016 05:23 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:52:53PM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>>> Because of die() at perf_parse_file() a config set was freed
>>> in collect_config(), if failed.
>>> But it is natural to free a config set after collect_config() is done
>>> when some problems happened.
>>>
>>> So, in case of failure, lastly free a config set at
>>> perf_config_set__new()
>>> instead of freeing the config set in collect_config().
>>>
>>> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>   tools/perf/util/config.c | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
>>> index b500737..d013f90 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
>>> @@ -639,7 +639,6 @@ static int collect_config(const char *var, const
>>> char *value,
>>>
>>>   out_free:
>>>       free(key);
>>> -    perf_config_set__delete(set);
>>>       return -1;
>>>   }
>>>
>>> @@ -649,7 +648,8 @@ struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void)
>>>
>>>       if (set) {
>>>           INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
>>> -        perf_config(collect_config, set);
>>> +        if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0)
>>> +            perf_config_set__delete(set);
>>>       }
>>>
>>>       return set;
>>
>> You can't do that, there is something missing, without looking at the
>> code I think you need:
>>
>>       if (set) {
>>           INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
>> -        perf_config(collect_config, set);
>> +        if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0) {
>> +            perf_config_set__delete(set);
>> +            set = NULL;
>> +        }
>>       }
>>
>>       return set;
>>
>> No?
>>
>
> Granted
> Sorry for missing above..
>
> I modified using 'return NULL;' instead of 'set = NULL;' as below
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
> index c73f1c4..cb749d3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
> @@ -643,7 +643,6 @@ static int collect_config(const char *var, const
> char *value,
>
>   out_free:
>           free(key);
> -        perf_config_set__delete(set);
>           return -1;
>   }
>
> @@ -653,7 +652,10 @@ struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void)
>
>           if (set) {
>                   INIT_LIST_HEAD(&set->sections);
> -                perf_config(collect_config, set);
> +                if (perf_config(collect_config, set) < 0) {
> +                        perf_config_set__delete(set);
> +                        return NULL;
> +                }
>           }
>
>           return set;
>
> Because in near future, perf_config_set__delete() will use zfree().
>
> will send changed this patch soon !
> Thank you for your review :)
>

Hum.. my answer was stupid.
There isn't difference between 'return NULL;' and 'set = NULL;'
as a result at perf_config_set__new().
And zfree() at perf_config_set__delete() aren't related to this situation..

Anyway.. I'll send v7 with changed this patch as you said!!

Thanks,
Taeung

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web