Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1414883 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-06 12:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-07 10:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> - 2016-06-06 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> - 2016-06-06 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> - 2016-06-07 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> - 2016-06-07 10:10 +0200
| From | Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-06 12:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero |
| Message-ID | <rH0gx-3Ib-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
'brightness' is usually an index into a table of duty_cycle values,
where the value at index 0 may well be non-zero
(tegra30-apalis-eval.dts and tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts are real-life
examples).
Thus brightness == 0 does not necessarily mean that the PWM output
will be inactive.
Check for 'duty_cycle == 0' rather than 'brightness == 0' to decide
whether to disable the PWM.
Signed-off-by: Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
---
drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
index b2b366b..80b2b52 100644
--- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
+++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
@@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ static int pwm_backlight_update_status(struct backlight_device *bl)
if (pb->notify)
brightness = pb->notify(pb->dev, brightness);
- if (brightness > 0) {
- duty_cycle = compute_duty_cycle(pb, brightness);
+ duty_cycle = compute_duty_cycle(pb, brightness);
+ if (duty_cycle > 0) {
pwm_config(pb->pwm, duty_cycle, pb->period);
pwm_backlight_power_on(pb, brightness);
} else
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-06 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rH1vX-4Me-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1414883 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi,
On 06/06/16 13:44, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> 'brightness' is usually an index into a table of duty_cycle values,
> where the value at index 0 may well be non-zero
> (tegra30-apalis-eval.dts and tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts are real-life
> examples).
> Thus brightness == 0 does not necessarily mean that the PWM output
> will be inactive.
> Check for 'duty_cycle == 0' rather than 'brightness == 0' to decide
> whether to disable the PWM.
The binding doc does say:
- brightness-levels: Array of distinct brightness levels. Typically these
are in the range from 0 to 255, but any range starting at 0 will do.
The actual brightness level (PWM duty cycle) will be interpolated
from these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle (darkest/off), while the
last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest).
Tomi
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 08:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero |
| Message-ID | <rHiZP-7Do-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1414966 |
Hi, On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:02:21 +0300 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Hi, > > On 06/06/16 13:44, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > 'brightness' is usually an index into a table of duty_cycle values, > > where the value at index 0 may well be non-zero > > (tegra30-apalis-eval.dts and tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts are real-life > > examples). > > Thus brightness == 0 does not necessarily mean that the PWM output > > will be inactive. > > Check for 'duty_cycle == 0' rather than 'brightness == 0' to decide > > whether to disable the PWM. > > The binding doc does say: > > - brightness-levels: Array of distinct brightness levels. Typically these > are in the range from 0 to 255, but any range starting at 0 will do. > The actual brightness level (PWM duty cycle) will be interpolated > from these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle (darkest/off), while the > last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest). > So, what should I do, when I need a range of levels that doesn't start at 0? E.g. if the brightness is inverse proportional to the PWM duty cycle. Lothar Waßmann
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHkff-6M-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1415754 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 07/06/16 09:49, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:02:21 +0300 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 06/06/16 13:44, Lothar Waßmann wrote: >>> 'brightness' is usually an index into a table of duty_cycle values, >>> where the value at index 0 may well be non-zero >>> (tegra30-apalis-eval.dts and tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts are real-life >>> examples). >>> Thus brightness == 0 does not necessarily mean that the PWM output >>> will be inactive. >>> Check for 'duty_cycle == 0' rather than 'brightness == 0' to decide >>> whether to disable the PWM. >> >> The binding doc does say: >> >> - brightness-levels: Array of distinct brightness levels. Typically these >> are in the range from 0 to 255, but any range starting at 0 will do. >> The actual brightness level (PWM duty cycle) will be interpolated >> from these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle (darkest/off), while the >> last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest). >> > So, what should I do, when I need a range of levels that doesn't start > at 0? E.g. if the brightness is inverse proportional to the PWM duty > cycle. That's a question to the PWM/backlight maintainers, but I think in the addition of your patch, the binding doc needs to be changed, as it doesn't hold true after your patch. Tomi
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web