Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1415714 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-07 07:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-08 02:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v1] PM / sleep: make pm notifier called symmetrically Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] PM / sleep: make pm notifier called symmetrically "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-06-08 02:40 +0200
| From | Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 07:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] PM / sleep: make pm notifier called symmetrically |
| Message-ID | <rHi3L-70i-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> wrote: >>> This makes pm notifier PREPARE/POST symmetrical: if PREPARE >>> fails, we will only undo what ever happened on PREPARE. >>> >>> It fixes the unbalanced cpu hotplug enable in cpu pm notifier. >> >> Can you please describe the problem you're trying to address in a bit >> more detail? > > It is described in another patch, and it is a common issue. I fixed > the similar issue several times, all because that the CPU_POST_SUSPEND > notifier callback is called without call CPU_SUSPEND_PREPARE notifier > callback before. Something is DO in PM_XXX_PREPARE and UNDO in > POST_XXX. If we don't DO it in XXX_PREPARE then we don't need to UNDO > it in PM_POST_XXX. > > Here is the link for the unbalanced cpu hotplug enable case: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/6/61 . > > Thanks, > Lianwei Did anyone from the maintainer review the patch yet?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHzHj-1h2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1415714 |
On Monday, June 06, 2016 10:41:25 PM Lianwei Wang wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Lianwei Wang <lianwei.wang@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> This makes pm notifier PREPARE/POST symmetrical: if PREPARE > >>> fails, we will only undo what ever happened on PREPARE. > >>> > >>> It fixes the unbalanced cpu hotplug enable in cpu pm notifier. > >> > >> Can you please describe the problem you're trying to address in a bit > >> more detail? > > > > It is described in another patch, and it is a common issue. I fixed > > the similar issue several times, all because that the CPU_POST_SUSPEND > > notifier callback is called without call CPU_SUSPEND_PREPARE notifier > > callback before. Something is DO in PM_XXX_PREPARE and UNDO in > > POST_XXX. If we don't DO it in XXX_PREPARE then we don't need to UNDO > > it in PM_POST_XXX. > > > > Here is the link for the unbalanced cpu hotplug enable case: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/6/61 . > > > > Thanks, > > Lianwei > > Did anyone from the maintainer review the patch yet? Yes, I have reviewed it, but not yet decided whether or not I will accept it. Thanks, Rafael
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web