Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1418048 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-06-09 06:00 +0200
Last post2016-06-10 19:10 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block  tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-06-09 06:00 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the  block tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-06-09 06:10 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the  block tree Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> - 2016-06-10 19:10 +0200

#1418048 — linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-06-09 06:00 +0200
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree
Message-ID<rHZip-RC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the device-mapper tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/md/dm.c

between commit:

  528ec5abe680 ("dm: pass dm stats data dir instead of bi_rw")
  c2df40dfb8c0 ("drivers: use req op accessor")
  3a5e02ced11e ("block, drivers: add REQ_OP_FLUSH operation")

from the block tree and commit:

  50d14ab0130a ("dm: move request-based code out to dm-rq.[hc]")

from the device-mapper tree.

I fixed it up (I used the device-mapper tree version of dm.c and then
applied the following patch) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 13:47:03 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] dm: fix merge of drivers/dm/dm-rq.c

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/md/dm-rq.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
index dfb0721a87fe..266f7b674108 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-rq.c
@@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ static void rq_end_stats(struct mapped_device *md, struct request *orig)
 	if (unlikely(dm_stats_used(&md->stats))) {
 		struct dm_rq_target_io *tio = tio_from_request(orig);
 		tio->duration_jiffies = jiffies - tio->duration_jiffies;
-		dm_stats_account_io(&md->stats, orig->cmd_flags, blk_rq_pos(orig),
-				    tio->n_sectors, true, tio->duration_jiffies,
-				    &tio->stats_aux);
+		dm_stats_account_io(&md->stats, rq_data_dir(orig),
+				    blk_rq_pos(orig), tio->n_sectors, true,
+				    tio->duration_jiffies, &tio->stats_aux);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static void dm_done(struct request *clone, int error, bool mapped)
 			r = rq_end_io(tio->ti, clone, error, &tio->info);
 	}
 
-	if (unlikely(r == -EREMOTEIO && (clone->cmd_flags & REQ_WRITE_SAME) &&
+	if (unlikely(r == -EREMOTEIO && (req_op(clone) == REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME) &&
 		     !clone->q->limits.max_write_same_sectors))
 		disable_write_same(tio->md);
 
@@ -681,8 +681,9 @@ static void dm_start_request(struct mapped_device *md, struct request *orig)
 		struct dm_rq_target_io *tio = tio_from_request(orig);
 		tio->duration_jiffies = jiffies;
 		tio->n_sectors = blk_rq_sectors(orig);
-		dm_stats_account_io(&md->stats, orig->cmd_flags, blk_rq_pos(orig),
-				    tio->n_sectors, false, 0, &tio->stats_aux);
+		dm_stats_account_io(&md->stats, rq_data_dir(orig),
+				    blk_rq_pos(orig), tio->n_sectors, false, 0,
+				    &tio->stats_aux);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -777,7 +778,7 @@ static void dm_old_request_fn(struct request_queue *q)
 
 		/* always use block 0 to find the target for flushes for now */
 		pos = 0;
-		if (!(rq->cmd_flags & REQ_FLUSH))
+		if (req_op(rq) != REQ_OP_FLUSH)
 			pos = blk_rq_pos(rq);
 
 		if ((dm_old_request_peeked_before_merge_deadline(md) &&
-- 
2.8.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1418050 — Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-06-09 06:10 +0200
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree
Message-ID<rHZs5-1ac-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1418048
Hi all,

On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 13:59:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>   50d14ab0130a ("dm: move request-based code out to dm-rq.[hc]")

By the way, resolving these conflicts would have been easier if this
commit had been split into "move with no changes" followed by "small
changes" commits.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1419600 — Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree

FromMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Date2016-06-10 19:10 +0200
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree
Message-ID<rIy6u-7n5-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1418050
On Thu, Jun 09 2016 at 12:02am -0400,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 13:59:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> >   50d14ab0130a ("dm: move request-based code out to dm-rq.[hc]")
> 
> By the way, resolving these conflicts would have been easier if this
> commit had been split into "move with no changes" followed by "small
> changes" commits.

Yeap, I understand.  I've folded your fix into the appropriate commit
and rebased DM's for-next (and dm-4.8) ontop of block's for-4.8/core.

Thanks,
Mike

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web