Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1417603 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399 Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-06-08 17:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-06-09 09:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399 Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-06-09 16:20 +0200

#1417603 — Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] add i2c driver supported for rk3399

Hi Wolfram,

Am Montag, 16. Mai 2016, 21:57:35 schrieb David Wu:
> There are three points differert from others:
>  - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399
>  - pclk and function clk are separated at rk3399
>  - add fast-plus mode supported for rk3399

this series looks pretty nice now and it seems most everybody is happy with it 
by now. Do you still have it in your inbox to look at, or should David resend 
it again?


Heiko

> David Wu (8):
>   i2c: rk3x: add documentation to fields in "struct rk3x_i2c"
>   i2c: rk3x: use struct "rk3x_i2c_calced_timings"
>   i2c: rk3x: Remove redundant rk3x_i2c_clean_ipd()
>   i2c: rk3x: Change SoC data to not use array
>   i2c: rk3x: Move spec timing data to "static const" structs
>   dt-bindings: i2c: rk3x: add support for rk3399
>   i2c: rk3x: add i2c support for rk3399 soc
>   i2c: rk3x: support fast-mode plus for rk3399
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt |  16 +-
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c                      | 498
> +++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1418140

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

> this series looks pretty nice now and it seems most everybody is happy with it 
> by now. Do you still have it in your inbox to look at, or should David resend 
> it again?

I use patchwork (as stated in MAINTAINERS), so nothing gets lost as long
as it is send to the i2c-list. As long as it still applies, no need to
resend. This series does have priority, thanks to the tags given.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1418374

Am Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2016, 09:47:53 schrieb Wolfram Sang:
> > this series looks pretty nice now and it seems most everybody is happy
> > with it by now. Do you still have it in your inbox to look at, or should
> > David resend it again?
> 
> I use patchwork (as stated in MAINTAINERS), so nothing gets lost as long
> as it is send to the i2c-list. As long as it still applies, no need to
> resend. This series does have priority, thanks to the tags given.

Just verified that everything still applies against 4.7-rc1 and present boards 
still have working i2c with this series.


Heiko

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web