Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1413312 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-03 17:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-08 14:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support weiqing kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com> - 2016-06-08 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support weiqing kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com> - 2016-06-08 14:10 +0200
| From | Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 17:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] pwm: Add MediaTek MT2701 display PWM driver support |
| Message-ID | <rFZmy-525-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 30/05/16 10:41, Weiqing Kong wrote:
> Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> and add MT2701 specific register operations, such as MT2701
> doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> before writing register, and needs to select manual mode
> and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weiqing Kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> index 0ad3385..03b9c9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> @@ -18,33 +18,44 @@
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> #define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
> -#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
>
> #define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
> #define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
>
> -#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
> #define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
> #define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
> #define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
>
> -#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
> #define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH 12
> #define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH) - 1)
>
> #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
> #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)
>
> +#define MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK BIT(1)
> +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG 0xb0
Do we need to set magic 0x3 in the debug register? If so, this should be
part of mtk_pwm_data, just as con0_sel.
> +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK 0x3
> +
> +struct mtk_pwm_data {
> + unsigned int enable_bit;
> + unsigned int con0;
> + unsigned int con0_sel;
> + unsigned int con1;
> + bool have_commit_reg;
> +};
> +
> struct mtk_disp_pwm {
> struct pwm_chip chip;
> struct clk *clk_main;
> struct clk *clk_mm;
> void __iomem *base;
> + const struct mtk_pwm_data *data;
Couldn't that just be the offset for the commit register and set it to
0x0 if the commit register is not present. Right now, we suppose the
DISP_PWM_EN is at offset 0x0, so this should not be a problem.
> };
>
> static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> @@ -106,12 +117,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> return err;
> }
>
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_0, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> + PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_1,
> - PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, value);
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 1);
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0);
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con1,
> + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK,
> + value);
> + if (mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x1);
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x0);
should be renamed to MT8173_PWM_COMMIT_MASK, although I'm not really a
friend of mixing up SoC specific defines with a Soc specific
mtk_disp_pwm structure.
Regards,
Matthias
> + }
>
> clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> @@ -134,7 +151,9 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> return err;
> }
>
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 1);
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> + mdp->data->enable_bit,
> + mdp->data->enable_bit);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -143,7 +162,8 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> {
> struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip);
>
> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 0);
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> + mdp->data->enable_bit, 0x0);
>
> clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> @@ -156,12 +176,41 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt8173_pwm_data = {
> + .enable_bit = BIT(0),
> + .con0 = 0x10,
> + .con0_sel = 0x0,
> + .con1 = 0x14,
> + .have_commit_reg = true,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt2701_pwm_data = {
> + .enable_bit = BIT(16),
> + .con0 = 0xa8,
> + .con0_sel = 0x2,
> + .con1 = 0xac,
> + .have_commit_reg = false,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-bls", .data = &mt2701_pwm_data},
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> +
> static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> + const struct of_device_id *id;
> struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp;
> struct resource *r;
> int ret;
>
> + id = of_match_device(mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> + if (!id)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> mdp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdp), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!mdp)
> return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -191,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops;
> mdp->chip.base = -1;
> mdp->chip.npwm = 1;
> + mdp->data = id->data;
>
> ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip);
> if (ret < 0) {
> @@ -200,6 +250,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
>
> + /*
> + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> + */
> + if (!mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG,
> + MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK, 0x3);
> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> + MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK,
> + mdp->data->con0_sel);
> + }
> +
> return 0;
>
> disable_clk_mm:
> @@ -221,13 +283,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm" },
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" },
> - { }
> -};
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> -
> static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm",
>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | weiqing kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHG67-5xf-61@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1413312 |
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 30/05/16 10:41, Weiqing Kong wrote:
> > Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> > and add MT2701 specific register operations, such as MT2701
> > doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> > before writing register, and needs to select manual mode
> > and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Weiqing Kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > index 0ad3385..03b9c9e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> > @@ -18,33 +18,44 @@
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/pwm.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
> > -#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > #define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
> > #define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
> > #define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
> >
> > -#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH 12
> > #define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH) - 1)
> >
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
> > #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)
> >
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK BIT(1)
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG 0xb0
>
> Do we need to set magic 0x3 in the debug register? If so, this should be
> part of mtk_pwm_data, just as con0_sel.
Do you mean that add bls_debug into struct mtk_pwm_data,
and set 0x3 in mt2701 data, 0x0 in mt8173 data?
>
> > +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK 0x3
> > +
> > +struct mtk_pwm_data {
> > + unsigned int enable_bit;
> > + unsigned int con0;
> > + unsigned int con0_sel;
> > + unsigned int con1;
> > + bool have_commit_reg;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm {
> > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > struct clk *clk_main;
> > struct clk *clk_mm;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > + const struct mtk_pwm_data *data;
>
> Couldn't that just be the offset for the commit register and set it to
> 0x0 if the commit register is not present. Right now, we suppose the
> DISP_PWM_EN is at offset 0x0, so this should not be a problem.
>
Do you mean that replace have_commit_reg with commit_reg_offset?
just like this?
bool have_commit_reg;
->
unsigned int commit_reg_offset;
and set commit_reg_offset 0x0 in mt2701, 0x1 in mt8173?
> > };
> >
> > static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > @@ -106,12 +117,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_0, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> > clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_1,
> > - PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, value);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 1);
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con1,
> > + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK,
> > + value);
> > + if (mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> > + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x0);
>
> should be renamed to MT8173_PWM_COMMIT_MASK, although I'm not really a
> friend of mixing up SoC specific defines with a Soc specific
> mtk_disp_pwm structure.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
ok, I will modify it as you said. thanks for you suggestion.
>
> > + }
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -134,7 +151,9 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 1);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -143,7 +162,8 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > {
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip);
> >
> > - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 0);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> > + mdp->data->enable_bit, 0x0);
> >
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> > clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> > @@ -156,12 +176,41 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = {
> > .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt8173_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(0),
> > + .con0 = 0x10,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x0,
> > + .con1 = 0x14,
> > + .have_commit_reg = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt2701_pwm_data = {
> > + .enable_bit = BIT(16),
> > + .con0 = 0xa8,
> > + .con0_sel = 0x2,
> > + .con1 = 0xac,
> > + .have_commit_reg = false,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-bls", .data = &mt2701_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> > + { }
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > +
> > static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + const struct of_device_id *id;
> > struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp;
> > struct resource *r;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + id = of_match_device(mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> > + if (!id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > mdp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdp), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!mdp)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > @@ -191,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops;
> > mdp->chip.base = -1;
> > mdp->chip.npwm = 1;
> > + mdp->data = id->data;
> >
> > ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -200,6 +250,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> > + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> > + */
> > + if (!mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG,
> > + MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK, 0x3);
> > + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> > + MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK,
> > + mdp->data->con0_sel);
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > disable_clk_mm:
> > @@ -221,13 +283,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm" },
> > - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" },
> > - { }
> > -};
> > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> > -
> > static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = {
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm",
> >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 13:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHJQm-7Xe-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416971 |
On 08/06/16 09:21, weiqing kong wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 30/05/16 10:41, Weiqing Kong wrote:
>>> Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
>>> and add MT2701 specific register operations, such as MT2701
>>> doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
>>> before writing register, and needs to select manual mode
>>> and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Weiqing Kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
>>> index 0ad3385..03b9c9e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
>>> @@ -18,33 +18,44 @@
>>> #include <linux/io.h>
>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>> #include <linux/pwm.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>>
>>> #define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
>>> -#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
>>>
>>> #define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
>>> #define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
>>>
>>> -#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
>>> #define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
>>> #define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
>>> #define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
>>>
>>> -#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
>>> #define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH 12
>>> #define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH) - 1)
>>>
>>> #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
>>> #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)
>>>
>>> +#define MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK BIT(1)
>>> +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG 0xb0
>>
>> Do we need to set magic 0x3 in the debug register? If so, this should be
>> part of mtk_pwm_data, just as con0_sel.
>
> Do you mean that add bls_debug into struct mtk_pwm_data,
> and set 0x3 in mt2701 data, 0x0 in mt8173 data?
>
Yes.
>>
>>> +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK 0x3
>>> +
>>> +struct mtk_pwm_data {
>>> + unsigned int enable_bit;
>>> + unsigned int con0;
>>> + unsigned int con0_sel;
>>> + unsigned int con1;
>>> + bool have_commit_reg;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> struct mtk_disp_pwm {
>>> struct pwm_chip chip;
>>> struct clk *clk_main;
>>> struct clk *clk_mm;
>>> void __iomem *base;
>>> + const struct mtk_pwm_data *data;
>>
>> Couldn't that just be the offset for the commit register and set it to
>> 0x0 if the commit register is not present. Right now, we suppose the
>> DISP_PWM_EN is at offset 0x0, so this should not be a problem.
>>
>
> Do you mean that replace have_commit_reg with commit_reg_offset?
> just like this?
> bool have_commit_reg;
> ->
> unsigned int commit_reg_offset;
> and set commit_reg_offset 0x0 in mt2701, 0x1 in mt8173?
>
No, you can set comit_reg_offset to the value of DISP_PWM_COMMIT for
mt8173 and 0x0 for mt2701. Then you can get rid of DISP_PWM_COMMIT.
Regards,
Matthias
>>> };
>>>
>>> static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>>> @@ -106,12 +117,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_0, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
>>> + PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
>>> clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
>>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_1,
>>> - PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, value);
>>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 1);
>>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0);
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con1,
>>> + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK,
>>> + value);
>>> + if (mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
>>> + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x1);
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
>>> + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x0);
>>
>> should be renamed to MT8173_PWM_COMMIT_MASK, although I'm not really a
>> friend of mixing up SoC specific defines with a Soc specific
>> mtk_disp_pwm structure.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>
> ok, I will modify it as you said. thanks for you suggestion.
>
>>
>>> + }
>>>
>>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
>>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
>>> @@ -134,7 +151,9 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 1);
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
>>> + mdp->data->enable_bit,
>>> + mdp->data->enable_bit);
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> @@ -143,7 +162,8 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>>> {
>>> struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip);
>>>
>>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 0);
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
>>> + mdp->data->enable_bit, 0x0);
>>>
>>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
>>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
>>> @@ -156,12 +176,41 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = {
>>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt8173_pwm_data = {
>>> + .enable_bit = BIT(0),
>>> + .con0 = 0x10,
>>> + .con0_sel = 0x0,
>>> + .con1 = 0x14,
>>> + .have_commit_reg = true,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt2701_pwm_data = {
>>> + .enable_bit = BIT(16),
>>> + .con0 = 0xa8,
>>> + .con0_sel = 0x2,
>>> + .con1 = 0xac,
>>> + .have_commit_reg = false,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-bls", .data = &mt2701_pwm_data},
>>> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
>>> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
>>> + { }
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
>>> +
>>> static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> + const struct of_device_id *id;
>>> struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp;
>>> struct resource *r;
>>> int ret;
>>>
>>> + id = of_match_device(mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
>>> + if (!id)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> mdp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdp), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (!mdp)
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> @@ -191,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops;
>>> mdp->chip.base = -1;
>>> mdp->chip.npwm = 1;
>>> + mdp->data = id->data;
>>>
>>> ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip);
>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>> @@ -200,6 +250,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>
>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
>>> + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
>>> + */
>>> + if (!mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG,
>>> + MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK, 0x3);
>>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
>>> + MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK,
>>> + mdp->data->con0_sel);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> disable_clk_mm:
>>> @@ -221,13 +283,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
>>> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm" },
>>> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" },
>>> - { }
>>> -};
>>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
>>> -
>>> static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = {
>>> .driver = {
>>> .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm",
>>>
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | weiqing kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHKt3-8pd-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1417311 |
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 13:22 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 08/06/16 09:21, weiqing kong wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30/05/16 10:41, Weiqing Kong wrote:
> >>> Use the mtk_pwm_data struction to define different registers
> >>> and add MT2701 specific register operations, such as MT2701
> >>> doesn't have commit register, needs to disable double buffer
> >>> before writing register, and needs to select manual mode
> >>> and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Weiqing Kong <weiqing.kong@mediatek.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> >>> index 0ad3385..03b9c9e 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.c
> >>> @@ -18,33 +18,44 @@
> >>> #include <linux/io.h>
> >>> #include <linux/module.h>
> >>> #include <linux/of.h>
> >>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>> #include <linux/pwm.h>
> >>> #include <linux/slab.h>
> >>>
> >>> #define DISP_PWM_EN 0x00
> >>> -#define PWM_ENABLE_MASK BIT(0)
> >>>
> >>> #define DISP_PWM_COMMIT 0x08
> >>> #define PWM_COMMIT_MASK BIT(0)
> >>>
> >>> -#define DISP_PWM_CON_0 0x10
> >>> #define PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT 16
> >>> #define PWM_CLKDIV_MAX 0x3ff
> >>> #define PWM_CLKDIV_MASK (PWM_CLKDIV_MAX << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT)
> >>>
> >>> -#define DISP_PWM_CON_1 0x14
> >>> #define PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH 12
> >>> #define PWM_PERIOD_MASK ((1 << PWM_PERIOD_BIT_WIDTH) - 1)
> >>>
> >>> #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
> >>> #define PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK (0x1fff << PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_SHIFT)
> >>>
> >>> +#define MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK BIT(1)
> >>> +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG 0xb0
> >>
> >> Do we need to set magic 0x3 in the debug register? If so, this should be
> >> part of mtk_pwm_data, just as con0_sel.
> >
> > Do you mean that add bls_debug into struct mtk_pwm_data,
> > and set 0x3 in mt2701 data, 0x0 in mt8173 data?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> >>
> >>> +#define MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK 0x3
> >>> +
> >>> +struct mtk_pwm_data {
> >>> + unsigned int enable_bit;
> >>> + unsigned int con0;
> >>> + unsigned int con0_sel;
> >>> + unsigned int con1;
> >>> + bool have_commit_reg;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> struct mtk_disp_pwm {
> >>> struct pwm_chip chip;
> >>> struct clk *clk_main;
> >>> struct clk *clk_mm;
> >>> void __iomem *base;
> >>> + const struct mtk_pwm_data *data;
> >>
> >> Couldn't that just be the offset for the commit register and set it to
> >> 0x0 if the commit register is not present. Right now, we suppose the
> >> DISP_PWM_EN is at offset 0x0, so this should not be a problem.
> >>
> >
> > Do you mean that replace have_commit_reg with commit_reg_offset?
> > just like this?
> > bool have_commit_reg;
> > ->
> > unsigned int commit_reg_offset;
> > and set commit_reg_offset 0x0 in mt2701, 0x1 in mt8173?
> >
>
> No, you can set comit_reg_offset to the value of DISP_PWM_COMMIT for
> mt8173 and 0x0 for mt2701. Then you can get rid of DISP_PWM_COMMIT.
>
> Regards,
> Matthias
ok, I got it, thanks.
>
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> static inline struct mtk_disp_pwm *to_mtk_disp_pwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> >>> @@ -106,12 +117,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >>> return err;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_0, PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> >>> + PWM_CLKDIV_MASK,
> >>> clk_div << PWM_CLKDIV_SHIFT);
> >>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_CON_1,
> >>> - PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK, value);
> >>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 1);
> >>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT, PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0);
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con1,
> >>> + PWM_PERIOD_MASK | PWM_HIGH_WIDTH_MASK,
> >>> + value);
> >>> + if (mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> >>> + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x1);
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_COMMIT,
> >>> + PWM_COMMIT_MASK, 0x0);
> >>
> >> should be renamed to MT8173_PWM_COMMIT_MASK, although I'm not really a
> >> friend of mixing up SoC specific defines with a Soc specific
> >> mtk_disp_pwm structure.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> >
> > ok, I will modify it as you said. thanks for you suggestion.
> >
> >>
> >>> + }
> >>>
> >>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> >>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> >>> @@ -134,7 +151,9 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >>> return err;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 1);
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> >>> + mdp->data->enable_bit,
> >>> + mdp->data->enable_bit);
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> @@ -143,7 +162,8 @@ static void mtk_disp_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >>> {
> >>> struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp = to_mtk_disp_pwm(chip);
> >>>
> >>> - mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN, PWM_ENABLE_MASK, 0);
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, DISP_PWM_EN,
> >>> + mdp->data->enable_bit, 0x0);
> >>>
> >>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_mm);
> >>> clk_disable(mdp->clk_main);
> >>> @@ -156,12 +176,41 @@ static const struct pwm_ops mtk_disp_pwm_ops = {
> >>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt8173_pwm_data = {
> >>> + .enable_bit = BIT(0),
> >>> + .con0 = 0x10,
> >>> + .con0_sel = 0x0,
> >>> + .con1 = 0x14,
> >>> + .have_commit_reg = true,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct mtk_pwm_data mt2701_pwm_data = {
> >>> + .enable_bit = BIT(16),
> >>> + .con0 = 0xa8,
> >>> + .con0_sel = 0x2,
> >>> + .con1 = 0xac,
> >>> + .have_commit_reg = false,
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> >>> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-bls", .data = &mt2701_pwm_data},
> >>> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> >>> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm", .data = &mt8173_pwm_data},
> >>> + { }
> >>> +};
> >>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> >>> +
> >>> static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> {
> >>> + const struct of_device_id *id;
> >>> struct mtk_disp_pwm *mdp;
> >>> struct resource *r;
> >>> int ret;
> >>>
> >>> + id = of_match_device(mtk_disp_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> >>> + if (!id)
> >>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>> +
> >>> mdp = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*mdp), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>> if (!mdp)
> >>> return -ENOMEM;
> >>> @@ -191,6 +240,7 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> mdp->chip.ops = &mtk_disp_pwm_ops;
> >>> mdp->chip.base = -1;
> >>> mdp->chip.npwm = 1;
> >>> + mdp->data = id->data;
> >>>
> >>> ret = pwmchip_add(&mdp->chip);
> >>> if (ret < 0) {
> >>> @@ -200,6 +250,18 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mdp);
> >>>
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * For MT2701, disable double buffer before writing register
> >>> + * and select manual mode and use PWM_PERIOD/PWM_HIGH_WIDTH.
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (!mdp->data->have_commit_reg) {
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG,
> >>> + MT2701_PWM_BLS_DEBUG_MASK, 0x3);
> >>> + mtk_disp_pwm_update_bits(mdp, mdp->data->con0,
> >>> + MT2701_PWM_MANUAL_SEL_MASK,
> >>> + mdp->data->con0_sel);
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> return 0;
> >>>
> >>> disable_clk_mm:
> >>> @@ -221,13 +283,6 @@ static int mtk_disp_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>> return ret;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static const struct of_device_id mtk_disp_pwm_of_match[] = {
> >>> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-pwm" },
> >>> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt6595-disp-pwm" },
> >>> - { }
> >>> -};
> >>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_disp_pwm_of_match);
> >>> -
> >>> static struct platform_driver mtk_disp_pwm_driver = {
> >>> .driver = {
> >>> .name = "mediatek-disp-pwm",
> >>>
> >
> >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web