Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1416843 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-08 05:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-08 13:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v5 2/3] sched/cputime: Fix prev steal time accouting during cpu hotplug Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 05:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] sched/cputime: Fix prev steal time accouting during cpu hotplug Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-06-08 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] sched/cputime: Fix prev steal time accouting during cpu hotplug Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 13:00 +0200
| From | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 05:10 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v5 2/3] sched/cputime: Fix prev steal time accouting during cpu hotplug |
| Message-ID | <rHC2t-2WJ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Commit e9532e69b8d1 ("sched/cputime: Fix steal time accounting vs. CPU hotplug")
set rq->prev_* to 0 after a cpu hotplug comes back in order to fix the scenario:
| steal is smaller than rq->prev_steal_time we end up with an insane large
| value which then gets added to rq->prev_steal_time, resulting in a permanent
| wreckage of the accounting.
However, it is still buggy.
rq->prev_steal_time = 0:
As Rik pointed out:
| setting rq->prev_irq_time to 0 in the guest, and then getting a giant value from
| the host, could result in a very large of steal_jiffies.
rq->prev_steal_time_rq = 0:
| steal = paravirt_steal_clock(cpu_of(rq));
| steal -= rq->prev_steal_time_rq;
|
| if (unlikely(steal > delta))
| steal = delta;
|
| rq->prev_steal_time_rq += steal;
| delta -= steal;
|
| rq->clock_task += delta;
steal is a giant value and rq->prev_steal_time_rq is 0, rq->prev_steal_time_rq
grows in delta granularity, rq->clock_task can't ramp up until rq->prev_steal_time_rq
catches up steal clock since delta value will be 0 after reducing steal time from
normal execution time. That's why I obersved that cpuhg/1-12 continue running
until rq->prev_steal_time_rq catches up steal clock timestamp.
I believe rq->prev_irq_time has similar issue. So this patch fix it by reverting
commit e9532e69b8d1.
Fixes: 'commit e9532e69b8d1 ("sched/cputime: Fix steal time accounting vs. CPU hotplug")'
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
---
v4 -> v5:
* revert commit e9532e69b8d1
kernel/sched/core.c | 1 -
kernel/sched/sched.h | 13 -------------
2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 7f2cae4..7d45bb3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7213,7 +7213,6 @@ static void sched_rq_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update;
- account_reset_rq(rq);
update_max_interval();
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 72f1f30..de607e4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1809,16 +1809,3 @@ static inline void cpufreq_trigger_update(u64 time) {}
#else /* arch_scale_freq_capacity */
#define arch_scale_freq_invariant() (false)
#endif
-
-static inline void account_reset_rq(struct rq *rq)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
- rq->prev_irq_time = 0;
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
- rq->prev_steal_time = 0;
-#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
- rq->prev_steal_time_rq = 0;
-#endif
-}
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 12:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] sched/cputime: Fix prev steal time accouting during cpu hotplug |
| Message-ID | <rHIAV-7fu-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416843 |
On 08/06/2016 05:05, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>
> Commit e9532e69b8d1 ("sched/cputime: Fix steal time accounting vs. CPU hotplug")
> set rq->prev_* to 0 after a cpu hotplug comes back in order to fix the scenario:
>
> | steal is smaller than rq->prev_steal_time we end up with an insane large
> | value which then gets added to rq->prev_steal_time, resulting in a permanent
> | wreckage of the accounting.
>
> However, it is still buggy.
>
> rq->prev_steal_time = 0:
>
> As Rik pointed out:
>
> | setting rq->prev_irq_time to 0 in the guest, and then getting a giant value from
> | the host, could result in a very large of steal_jiffies.
>
> rq->prev_steal_time_rq = 0:
>
> | steal = paravirt_steal_clock(cpu_of(rq));
> | steal -= rq->prev_steal_time_rq;
> |
> | if (unlikely(steal > delta))
> | steal = delta;
> |
> | rq->prev_steal_time_rq += steal;
> | delta -= steal;
> |
> | rq->clock_task += delta;
>
> steal is a giant value and rq->prev_steal_time_rq is 0, rq->prev_steal_time_rq
> grows in delta granularity, rq->clock_task can't ramp up until rq->prev_steal_time_rq
> catches up steal clock since delta value will be 0 after reducing steal time from
> normal execution time. That's why I obersved that cpuhg/1-12 continue running
> until rq->prev_steal_time_rq catches up steal clock timestamp.
>
> I believe rq->prev_irq_time has similar issue. So this patch fix it by reverting
> commit e9532e69b8d1.
This is still very hard to read. I think the justification for this
patch is much simpler:
-------
Commit e9532e69b8d1 ("sched/cputime: Fix steal time accounting vs. CPU
hotplug") set rq->prev_* to 0 after a cpu hotplug comes back in order to
fix the case where (after CPU hotplug) steal is smaller than
rq->prev_steal_time.
However, this should never happen. steal was only smaller because of the
KVM-specific bug fixed by the previous patch. Worse, the previous patch
triggers a bug on CPU hot-unplug/plug operation: because
rq->prev_steal_time is cleared, all of the CPU's past steal time will be
accounted again on hot-plug.
Since the root cause has been fixed, we can just revert commit e9532e69b8d1.
-------
Since things are currently pretty broken, I think it's fair to keep the
two patches separate instead of squashing them.
Paolo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 13:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] sched/cputime: Fix prev steal time accouting during cpu hotplug |
| Message-ID | <rHJnj-7xx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1417238 |
2016-06-08 18:01 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>:
>
>
> On 08/06/2016 05:05, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>>
>> Commit e9532e69b8d1 ("sched/cputime: Fix steal time accounting vs. CPU hotplug")
>> set rq->prev_* to 0 after a cpu hotplug comes back in order to fix the scenario:
>>
>> | steal is smaller than rq->prev_steal_time we end up with an insane large
>> | value which then gets added to rq->prev_steal_time, resulting in a permanent
>> | wreckage of the accounting.
>>
>> However, it is still buggy.
>>
>> rq->prev_steal_time = 0:
>>
>> As Rik pointed out:
>>
>> | setting rq->prev_irq_time to 0 in the guest, and then getting a giant value from
>> | the host, could result in a very large of steal_jiffies.
>>
>> rq->prev_steal_time_rq = 0:
>>
>> | steal = paravirt_steal_clock(cpu_of(rq));
>> | steal -= rq->prev_steal_time_rq;
>> |
>> | if (unlikely(steal > delta))
>> | steal = delta;
>> |
>> | rq->prev_steal_time_rq += steal;
>> | delta -= steal;
>> |
>> | rq->clock_task += delta;
>>
>> steal is a giant value and rq->prev_steal_time_rq is 0, rq->prev_steal_time_rq
>> grows in delta granularity, rq->clock_task can't ramp up until rq->prev_steal_time_rq
>> catches up steal clock since delta value will be 0 after reducing steal time from
>> normal execution time. That's why I obersved that cpuhg/1-12 continue running
>> until rq->prev_steal_time_rq catches up steal clock timestamp.
>>
>> I believe rq->prev_irq_time has similar issue. So this patch fix it by reverting
>> commit e9532e69b8d1.
>
> This is still very hard to read. I think the justification for this
> patch is much simpler:
>
> -------
> Commit e9532e69b8d1 ("sched/cputime: Fix steal time accounting vs. CPU
> hotplug") set rq->prev_* to 0 after a cpu hotplug comes back in order to
> fix the case where (after CPU hotplug) steal is smaller than
> rq->prev_steal_time.
>
> However, this should never happen. steal was only smaller because of the
> KVM-specific bug fixed by the previous patch. Worse, the previous patch
> triggers a bug on CPU hot-unplug/plug operation: because
> rq->prev_steal_time is cleared, all of the CPU's past steal time will be
> accounted again on hot-plug.
>
> Since the root cause has been fixed, we can just revert commit e9532e69b8d1.
> -------
Thanks Paolo! :)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web