Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1413369 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-03 19:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-08 11:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Fix NULL pointer deference Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 19:20 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Fix unaligned used of reference counters Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> - 2016-06-03 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Fix unaligned used of reference counters Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-06-08 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Fix NULL pointer deference Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-06-08 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Fix NULL pointer deference Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-06-08 11:50 +0200
| From | Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 19:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Fix NULL pointer deference |
| Message-ID | <rG0Vj-64k-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Under some circumstances, a gpiochip might be half cleaned from the gpio_device list. This patch makes sure that the chip pointer is still valid, before calling the match function. [ 104.088296] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000090 [ 104.089772] IP: [<ffffffff813d2045>] of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate+0x15/0x80 [ 104.128273] Call Trace: [ 104.129802] [<ffffffff813d2030>] ? of_parse_own_gpio+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 104.131353] [<ffffffff813cd910>] gpiochip_find+0x60/0x90 [ 104.132868] [<ffffffff813d21ba>] of_get_named_gpiod_flags+0x9a/0x120 ... [ 104.141586] [<ffffffff8163d12b>] gpio_led_probe+0x11b/0x360 Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> --- We might want to cc: stable on these two patches drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index d407f904a31c..0626cc96744b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ struct gpio_chip *gpiochip_find(void *data, spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); list_for_each_entry(gdev, &gpio_devices, list) - if (match(gdev->chip, data)) + if (gdev->chip && match(gdev->chip, data)) break; /* No match? */ -- 2.8.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 19:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Fix unaligned used of reference counters |
| Message-ID | <rG0Vj-64k-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1413369 |
gpiolib relies on the reference counters to clean up the gpio_device
structure.
Although the number of get/put is properly aligned on gpiolib.c
itself, it does not take into consideration how the referece counters
are affected by other external functions such as cdev_add and device_add.
Because of this, after the last call to put_device, the reference counter
has a value of +3, therefore never calling gpiodevice_release.
Due to the fact that some of the device has already been cleaned on
gpiochip_remove, the library will end up OOPsing the kernel (e.g. a call
to of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate).
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com>
---
We might want to cc: stable on these two patches
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 0626cc96744b..d829f2127524 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -438,7 +438,6 @@ static void gpiodevice_release(struct device *dev)
{
struct gpio_device *gdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- cdev_del(&gdev->chrdev);
list_del(&gdev->list);
ida_simple_remove(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
kfree(gdev->label);
@@ -471,7 +470,6 @@ static int gpiochip_setup_dev(struct gpio_device *gdev)
/* From this point, the .release() function cleans up gpio_device */
gdev->dev.release = gpiodevice_release;
- get_device(&gdev->dev);
pr_debug("%s: registered GPIOs %d to %d on device: %s (%s)\n",
__func__, gdev->base, gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1,
dev_name(&gdev->dev), gdev->chip->label ? : "generic");
@@ -759,6 +757,8 @@ void gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
* be removed, else it will be dangling until the last user is
* gone.
*/
+ cdev_del(&gdev->chrdev);
+ device_del(&gdev->dev);
put_device(&gdev->dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_remove);
--
2.8.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 11:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpiolib: Fix unaligned used of reference counters |
| Message-ID | <rHHvc-6mU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1413370 |
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> wrote: > gpiolib relies on the reference counters to clean up the gpio_device > structure. > > Although the number of get/put is properly aligned on gpiolib.c > itself, it does not take into consideration how the referece counters > are affected by other external functions such as cdev_add and device_add. > > Because of this, after the last call to put_device, the reference counter > has a value of +3, therefore never calling gpiodevice_release. > > Due to the fact that some of the device has already been cleaned on > gpiochip_remove, the library will end up OOPsing the kernel (e.g. a call > to of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate). > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> Again, thanks for fixing my stupid mistakes. Applied and tagged for stable. Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 10:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHHbQ-6et-69@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1413369 |
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> wrote: > Under some circumstances, a gpiochip might be half cleaned from the > gpio_device list. > > This patch makes sure that the chip pointer is still valid, before > calling the match function. > > [ 104.088296] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at > 0000000000000090 > [ 104.089772] IP: [<ffffffff813d2045>] of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate+0x15/0x80 > [ 104.128273] Call Trace: > [ 104.129802] [<ffffffff813d2030>] ? of_parse_own_gpio+0x1f0/0x1f0 > [ 104.131353] [<ffffffff813cd910>] gpiochip_find+0x60/0x90 > [ 104.132868] [<ffffffff813d21ba>] of_get_named_gpiod_flags+0x9a/0x120 > ... > [ 104.141586] [<ffffffff8163d12b>] gpio_led_probe+0x11b/0x360 > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> Oh there is the fix that Roger and Grygorii needs. Applied to fixes and tagged for stable. Sorry for screwing things up :( Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHIhA-6SV-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1417059 |
On 06/08/2016 11:39 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado > <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Under some circumstances, a gpiochip might be half cleaned from the >> gpio_device list. >> >> This patch makes sure that the chip pointer is still valid, before >> calling the match function. >> >> [ 104.088296] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at >> 0000000000000090 >> [ 104.089772] IP: [<ffffffff813d2045>] of_gpiochip_find_and_xlate+0x15/0x80 >> [ 104.128273] Call Trace: >> [ 104.129802] [<ffffffff813d2030>] ? of_parse_own_gpio+0x1f0/0x1f0 >> [ 104.131353] [<ffffffff813cd910>] gpiochip_find+0x60/0x90 >> [ 104.132868] [<ffffffff813d21ba>] of_get_named_gpiod_flags+0x9a/0x120 >> ... >> [ 104.141586] [<ffffffff8163d12b>] gpio_led_probe+0x11b/0x360 >> >> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> > > Oh there is the fix that Roger and Grygorii needs. > > Applied to fixes and tagged for stable. > > Sorry for screwing things up :( > Np. :) -- regards, -grygorii
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web