Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1416125 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-07 14:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-08 15:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 6 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexes Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-06-07 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexes Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexes Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> - 2016-06-08 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexes Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> - 2016-06-08 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexes Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-07 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexes Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-08 15:10 +0200
| From | Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 14:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexes |
| Message-ID | <rHosx-2GV-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Mike Galbraith reported that the LTP test case futex_wake04 was broken
by commit 65d8fc777f6d ("futex: Remove requirement for lock_page()
in get_futex_key()").
This test case uses futexes backed by hugetlbfs pages and so there is an
associated inode with a futex stored on such pages. The problem is that
the key is being calculated based on the head page index of the hugetlbfs
page and not the tail page.
Prior to the optimisation, the page lock was used to stabilise mappings and
pin the inode is file-backed which is overkill. If the page was a compound
page, the head page was automatically looked up as part of the page lock
operation but the tail page index was used to calculate the futex key.
After the optimisation, the compound head is looked up early and the page
lock is only relied upon to identify truncated pages, special pages or a
shmem page moving to swapcache. The head page is looked up because without
the page lock, special care has to be taken to pin the inode correctly.
However, the tail page is still required to calculate the futex key so this
patch records the tail page.
On vanilla 4.6, the output of the test case is;
futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152
futex_wake04 1 TFAIL : futex_wake04.c:126: Bug: wait_thread2 did not wake after 30 secs.
With the patch applied
futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152
futex_wake04 1 TPASS : Hi hydra, thread2 awake!
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
kernel/futex.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index c20f06f38ef3..6555d5459e98 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw)
{
unsigned long address = (unsigned long)uaddr;
struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
- struct page *page;
+ struct page *page, *tail;
struct address_space *mapping;
int err, ro = 0;
@@ -530,7 +530,15 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw)
* considered here and page lock forces unnecessarily serialization
* From this point on, mapping will be re-verified if necessary and
* page lock will be acquired only if it is unavoidable
- */
+ *
+ * Mapping checks require the head page for any compound page so the
+ * head page and mapping is looked up now. For anonymous pages, it
+ * does not matter if the page splits in the future as the key is
+ * based on the address. For filesystem-backed pages, the tail is
+ * required as the index of the page determines the key. For
+ * base pages, there is no tail page and tail == page.
+ */
+ tail = page;
page = compound_head(page);
mapping = READ_ONCE(page->mapping);
@@ -654,7 +662,7 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw)
key->both.offset |= FUT_OFF_INODE; /* inode-based key */
key->shared.inode = inode;
- key->shared.pgoff = basepage_index(page);
+ key->shared.pgoff = basepage_index(tail);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHtse-5IE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416125 |
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 19:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:30:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Wants a stable tag so it gets auto-snarfed by Greg?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHGIO-64G-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416475 |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:52:59PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 19:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:30:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > Wants a stable tag so it gets auto-snarfed by Greg? Can I assume it passed tests for you? If so, I'll resend with any acks and a "# 4.6+" stable tag to Thomas assuming he does not object to the patch in the meantime. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 10:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHHlv-6ig-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1417024 |
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 09:04 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:52:59PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 19:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:30:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> > > > > > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> > > > > Wants a stable tag so it gets auto-snarfed by Greg? > > Can I assume it passed tests for you? While I didn't test this specific patch, modulo 'tail' vs 'pinned', it's identical to the three liner I tested to confirm that the get/put_page() bits I added were in indeed superfluous.. so yeah, it definitely squashes buglet. -Mike
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 20:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHtse-5IE-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416125 |
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:30:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Mike Galbraith reported that the LTP test case futex_wake04 was broken
> by commit 65d8fc777f6d ("futex: Remove requirement for lock_page()
> in get_futex_key()").
>
> This test case uses futexes backed by hugetlbfs pages and so there is an
> associated inode with a futex stored on such pages. The problem is that
> the key is being calculated based on the head page index of the hugetlbfs
> page and not the tail page.
>
> Prior to the optimisation, the page lock was used to stabilise mappings and
> pin the inode is file-backed which is overkill. If the page was a compound
> page, the head page was automatically looked up as part of the page lock
> operation but the tail page index was used to calculate the futex key.
>
> After the optimisation, the compound head is looked up early and the page
> lock is only relied upon to identify truncated pages, special pages or a
> shmem page moving to swapcache. The head page is looked up because without
> the page lock, special care has to be taken to pin the inode correctly.
> However, the tail page is still required to calculate the futex key so this
> patch records the tail page.
>
> On vanilla 4.6, the output of the test case is;
>
> futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152
> futex_wake04 1 TFAIL : futex_wake04.c:126: Bug: wait_thread2 did not wake after 30 secs.
>
> With the patch applied
>
> futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152
> futex_wake04 1 TPASS : Hi hydra, thread2 awake!
>
> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index c20f06f38ef3..6555d5459e98 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw)
> {
> unsigned long address = (unsigned long)uaddr;
> struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> - struct page *page;
> + struct page *page, *tail;
> struct address_space *mapping;
> int err, ro = 0;
>
> @@ -530,7 +530,15 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw)
> * considered here and page lock forces unnecessarily serialization
> * From this point on, mapping will be re-verified if necessary and
> * page lock will be acquired only if it is unavoidable
> - */
> + *
> + * Mapping checks require the head page for any compound page so the
> + * head page and mapping is looked up now. For anonymous pages, it
> + * does not matter if the page splits in the future as the key is
> + * based on the address. For filesystem-backed pages, the tail is
> + * required as the index of the page determines the key. For
> + * base pages, there is no tail page and tail == page.
> + */
> + tail = page;
> page = compound_head(page);
> mapping = READ_ONCE(page->mapping);
>
> @@ -654,7 +662,7 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key, int rw)
>
> key->both.offset |= FUT_OFF_INODE; /* inode-based key */
> key->shared.inode = inode;
> - key->shared.pgoff = basepage_index(page);
> + key->shared.pgoff = basepage_index(tail);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-08 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rHLp8-yc-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1416125 |
On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Mel Gorman wrote:
>Mike Galbraith reported that the LTP test case futex_wake04 was broken
>by commit 65d8fc777f6d ("futex: Remove requirement for lock_page()
>in get_futex_key()").
>
>This test case uses futexes backed by hugetlbfs pages and so there is an
>associated inode with a futex stored on such pages. The problem is that
>the key is being calculated based on the head page index of the hugetlbfs
>page and not the tail page.
>
>Prior to the optimisation, the page lock was used to stabilise mappings and
>pin the inode is file-backed which is overkill. If the page was a compound
>page, the head page was automatically looked up as part of the page lock
>operation but the tail page index was used to calculate the futex key.
>
>After the optimisation, the compound head is looked up early and the page
>lock is only relied upon to identify truncated pages, special pages or a
>shmem page moving to swapcache. The head page is looked up because without
>the page lock, special care has to be taken to pin the inode correctly.
>However, the tail page is still required to calculate the futex key so this
>patch records the tail page.
>
>On vanilla 4.6, the output of the test case is;
>
>futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152
>futex_wake04 1 TFAIL : futex_wake04.c:126: Bug: wait_thread2 did not wake after 30 secs.
>
>With the patch applied
>
>futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152
>futex_wake04 1 TPASS : Hi hydra, thread2 awake!
>
>Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
>Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
(and yay for maintaining performance)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web