Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1415302 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-06 19:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-06 23:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] locking/rwsem: Add reader-owned state to the owner field Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-06-06 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] locking/rwsem: Add reader-owned state to the owner field Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-06-06 23:10 +0200
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-06 19:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] locking/rwsem: Add reader-owned state to the owner field |
| Message-ID | <rH6lY-7QH-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Ingo -- is there any reason why this series (or at least this particular patch) was not picked up (being in Peter's queue)? It seems that all the recent rwsem changes are now in -tip, with the exception of these. Thanks, Davidlohr
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-06 23:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rH9Wx-1Fh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1415302 |
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:18:16AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Hi Ingo -- is there any reason why this series (or at least this particular > patch) was not picked up (being in Peter's queue)? It seems that all the > recent rwsem changes are now in -tip, with the exception of these. I placed it after Jason's atomic_long_t patches which fell through, which resulted in these patches not applying. I'll try and get the lot fixed up and such..
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web