Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1413615 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hugh Sipiere <hgsipiere@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-04 02:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-04 12:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] Drivers: ssb: Fix bare unsigned and changed to trailing comments Hugh Sipiere <hgsipiere@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] Drivers: ssb: Fix bare unsigned and changed to trailing comments Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com> - 2016-06-04 12:50 +0200
| From | Hugh Sipiere <hgsipiere@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 02:40 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] Drivers: ssb: Fix bare unsigned and changed to trailing comments |
| Message-ID | <rG7N7-1Mj-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I changed drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c to better fit the coding style.
I changed unsigned to unsigned int
Two comments were changed to not end on a line with the text.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Sipiere <hgsipiere@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c
index 180e027..49f858c 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
**************************************************/
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SSB_EMBEDDED)
-static int ssb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
+static int ssb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -38,14 +38,14 @@ static int ssb_gpio_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
* ChipCommon
**************************************************/
-static int ssb_gpio_chipco_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
+static int ssb_gpio_chipco_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
return !!ssb_chipco_gpio_in(&bus->chipco, 1 << gpio);
}
-static void ssb_gpio_chipco_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio,
+static void ssb_gpio_chipco_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio,
int value)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void ssb_gpio_chipco_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio,
}
static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned gpio)
+ unsigned int gpio)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
}
static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned gpio, int value)
+ unsigned int gpio, int value)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
return 0;
}
-static int ssb_gpio_chipco_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
+static int ssb_gpio_chipco_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
return 0;
}
-static void ssb_gpio_chipco_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
+static void ssb_gpio_chipco_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_init(struct ssb_bus *bus)
chip->ngpio = 16;
/* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be
* deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get
- * a random base number. */
+ * a random base number.
+ */
if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB)
chip->base = 0;
else
@@ -256,14 +257,14 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_init(struct ssb_bus *bus)
#ifdef CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_EXTIF
-static int ssb_gpio_extif_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio)
+static int ssb_gpio_extif_get_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
return !!ssb_extif_gpio_in(&bus->extif, 1 << gpio);
}
-static void ssb_gpio_extif_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned gpio,
+static void ssb_gpio_extif_set_value(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio,
int value)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -281,7 +282,7 @@ static int ssb_gpio_extif_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
}
static int ssb_gpio_extif_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned gpio, int value)
+ unsigned int gpio, int value)
{
struct ssb_bus *bus = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
@@ -424,7 +425,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_extif_init(struct ssb_bus *bus)
chip->ngpio = 5;
/* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be
* deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get
- * a random base number. */
+ * a random base number.
+ */
if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB)
chip->base = 0;
else
--
2.5.5
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-04 12:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rGhjr-7JO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1413615 |
Hi Hugh, On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Hugh Sipiere <hgsipiere@gmail.com> wrote: > I changed drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c to better fit the coding style. > I changed unsigned to unsigned int > Two comments were changed to not end on a line with the text. > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Sipiere <hgsipiere@gmail.com> You should separate the changes into two patches, one to change "unsigned" to "unsigned int" and one to fix the comments. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web