Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1414783 > unrolled thread

[RESEND PATCH 04/14] eeprom: at24: call read/write functions via function pointers

Started byBartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
First post2016-06-06 11:00 +0200
Last post2016-06-06 11:00 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [RESEND PATCH 04/14] eeprom: at24: call read/write functions via function pointers Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> - 2016-06-06 11:00 +0200

#1414783 — [RESEND PATCH 04/14] eeprom: at24: call read/write functions via function pointers

FromBartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date2016-06-06 11:00 +0200
Subject[RESEND PATCH 04/14] eeprom: at24: call read/write functions via function pointers
Message-ID<rGYy5-2yM-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
The first step in simplifying the read and write functions is to call
them via function pointers stored in at24_data. When we eventually
split the routines into smaller ones (depending on whether they use
smbus or i2c operations) we'll simply assign them to said pointers
instead of checking the flags at runtime every time we read/write.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
---
 drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
index 564a201..0621937 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c
@@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ struct at24_data {
 	int use_smbus;
 	int use_smbus_write;
 
+	ssize_t (*read_func)(struct at24_data *, char *, unsigned int, size_t);
+	ssize_t (*write_func)(struct at24_data *,
+			      const char *, unsigned int, size_t);
+
 	/*
 	 * Lock protects against activities from other Linux tasks,
 	 * but not from changes by other I2C masters.
@@ -351,7 +355,7 @@ static int at24_read(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
 	while (count) {
 		int	status;
 
-		status = at24_eeprom_read(at24, buf, off, count);
+		status = at24->read_func(at24, buf, off, count);
 		if (status < 0) {
 			mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
 			return status;
@@ -383,7 +387,7 @@ static int at24_write(void *priv, unsigned int off, void *val, size_t count)
 	while (count) {
 		int status;
 
-		status = at24_eeprom_write(at24, buf, off, count);
+		status = at24->write_func(at24, buf, off, count);
 		if (status < 0) {
 			mutex_unlock(&at24->lock);
 			return status;
@@ -518,6 +522,9 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
 	at24->chip = chip;
 	at24->num_addresses = num_addresses;
 
+	at24->read_func = at24_eeprom_read;
+	at24->write_func = at24_eeprom_write;
+
 	writable = !(chip.flags & AT24_FLAG_READONLY);
 	if (writable) {
 		if (!use_smbus || use_smbus_write) {
-- 
2.7.4

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web