Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1411616 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Rework clk/vt8500 wm8650_find_pll_bits()

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/2] Rework clk/vt8500 wm8650_find_pll_bits() Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2016-06-02 00:10 +0200

#1411616 — Re: [PATCH 0/2] Rework clk/vt8500 wm8650_find_pll_bits()

On 05/31, Roman Volkov wrote:
> В Tue, 24 May 2016 23:07:51 +0300
> Roman Volkov <v1ron@mail.ru> пишет:
> 
> > From: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@v1ros.org>
> > 
> > Hi Arnd and others,
> > 
> > This patch finally removes the warnings from GCC about possibly
> > uninitialized variables 'best_div2', 'best_div1', and 'best_mul'.
> > Also one of the functions is reworked, so that the algorithm is much
> > easier. This is to continue the work started in [1].
> > 
> > This code is tested on WM8650. Also the testing app was used in
> > user-mode to check possible values and performance [2].
> > 
> > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/1/149
> > [2] https://github.com/v1ron/vt8500-clkrange
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Roman Volkov (2):
> >   clk/vt8500: Rework wm8650_find_pll_bits()
> >   clk/vt8500: Fix compilation warnings
> > 
> >  drivers/clk/clk-vt8500.c | 81
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 39
> > insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Do we need this change during this merge window?
> 

The warning has been there for since before this merge window, so
if anything this is v4.8 material.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web