Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1412420 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-02 18:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-03 03:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> - 2016-06-02 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> - 2016-06-03 03:10 +0200
| From | Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-02 18:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl |
| Message-ID | <rFDP3-8ex-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 05/17/2016 09:13 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote: > On 05/08/2016 10:56 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> >> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 18:04:12 -0500 >> >>> This pair of patches does away with what I believe is a useless denial >>> audit message when a privileged process initially accesses a net sysctl. >> >> The LSM folks can apply this if they agree with you. > > Hi James - Could you pick up these two bug fix patches? Thanks! Hello - Just checking in again to see if you plan on taking these through the security tree? Tyler
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | James Morris <jmorris@namei.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-03 03:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rFLMC-4Zt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1412420 |
On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Tyler Hicks wrote: > On 05/17/2016 09:13 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > On 05/08/2016 10:56 PM, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> > >> Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 18:04:12 -0500 > >> > >>> This pair of patches does away with what I believe is a useless denial > >>> audit message when a privileged process initially accesses a net sysctl. > >> > >> The LSM folks can apply this if they agree with you. > > > > Hi James - Could you pick up these two bug fix patches? Thanks! > > Hello - Just checking in again to see if you plan on taking these > through the security tree? Sure, please resend. -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web