Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1410713 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx

Started byJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
First post2016-06-01 03:10 +0200
Last post2016-06-01 08:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> - 2016-06-01 03:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> - 2016-06-01 08:50 +0200

#1410713 — Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx

FromJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date2016-06-01 03:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx
Message-ID<rF2Pv-1CU-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:10:26 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> I think next steps is to get this merged into docs-next, with a stable
> tag, so that I can pull it into drm-misc.

So, I want to take another look at this, which probably will need another
day or two before it can happen.  First impression, though, is that this
is great, so I'm expecting that I'll be applying it.

Not sure about the stable tag, though?  It doesn't really seem like
stable material?  

jon

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1410857

FromDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date2016-06-01 08:50 +0200
Message-ID<rF88y-4XQ-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1410713
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:10:26 +0200
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
>> I think next steps is to get this merged into docs-next, with a stable
>> tag, so that I can pull it into drm-misc.
>
> So, I want to take another look at this, which probably will need another
> day or two before it can happen.  First impression, though, is that this
> is great, so I'm expecting that I'll be applying it.
>
> Not sure about the stable tag, though?  It doesn't really seem like
> stable material?

Oh, I meant a git tag of a stable (non-rebasing) branch that I can
pull into drm-misc so that we can apply the gpu.tmpl->gpu.rst
conversion on top. Not a cc: stable tag. Too many kinds of stable tags
I guess ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web