Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1409840 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-31 08:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-31 22:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
fou: dead build rule for fou6.o Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 08:30 +0200
Re: fou: dead build rule for fou6.o Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-31 12:10 +0200
Re: fou: dead build rule for fou6.o Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-31 15:20 +0200
Re: fou: dead build rule for fou6.o Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-05-31 22:50 +0200
| From | Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 08:30 +0200 |
| Subject | fou: dead build rule for fou6.o |
| Message-ID | <rELlE-7d7-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Arnd,
your commit fabb13db448e ("fou: add Kconfig options for IPv6 support")
has shown up in today's linux-next. ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py
warned because of the following statement in net/ipv6/Makefile:
+obj-$(CONFIG_NET_FOU_IPV6_TUNNELS) += fou6.o
The referenced Kconfig option does not exist, but I assume the right
option is 'IPV6_FOU_TUNNEL'? In case yes, the modified #if block in
the commit could be removed (redundant check).
Best regards,
Valentin
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rEOMy-1jV-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1409840 |
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:25:40 AM CEST Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> your commit fabb13db448e ("fou: add Kconfig options for IPv6 support")
> has shown up in today's linux-next. ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py
> warned because of the following statement in net/ipv6/Makefile:
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_FOU_IPV6_TUNNELS) += fou6.o
Thanks for the report, that was indeed a mistake.
> The referenced Kconfig option does not exist, but I assume the right
> option is 'IPV6_FOU_TUNNEL'? In case yes, the modified #if block in
> the commit could be removed (redundant check).
It's supposed to be CONFIG_IPV6_FOU, not CONFIG_IPV6_FOU_TUNNEL.
I've put that into my randconfig builder now to see if I get any
other regressions with that. What happened here is that after my
incorrect patch, the file never got built, so I did not see build
errors either. However it is possible that I made another mistake
in the same patch and it needs more changes, so let me first check
if this one-line change works correctly.
Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rERKq-3dI-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1409840 |
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:25:40 AM CEST Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> your commit fabb13db448e ("fou: add Kconfig options for IPv6 support")
> has shown up in today's linux-next. ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py
> warned because of the following statement in net/ipv6/Makefile:
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_FOU_IPV6_TUNNELS) += fou6.o
>
> The referenced Kconfig option does not exist, but I assume the right
> option is 'IPV6_FOU_TUNNEL'? In case yes, the modified #if block in
> the commit could be removed (redundant check).
I found another mistake that was hidden by the one you found.
The option controlling the file is IPV6_TUNNEL, not INET6_TUNNEL.
I'm currently testing with the patch below to address both bugs.
Arnd
diff --git a/net/ipv6/Kconfig b/net/ipv6/Kconfig
index 994608263260..2343e4f2e0bf 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/Kconfig
+++ b/net/ipv6/Kconfig
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ config IPV6_FOU
config IPV6_FOU_TUNNEL
tristate
default NET_FOU_IP_TUNNELS && IPV6_FOU
- select INET6_TUNNEL
+ select IPV6_TUNNEL
config IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES
bool "IPv6: Multiple Routing Tables"
diff --git a/net/ipv6/Makefile b/net/ipv6/Makefile
index d42ca3d1197f..6d8ea099213e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/Makefile
+++ b/net/ipv6/Makefile
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_IPV6_VTI) += ip6_vti.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IPV6_SIT) += sit.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL) += ip6_tunnel.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IPV6_GRE) += ip6_gre.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_NET_FOU_IPV6_TUNNELS) += fou6.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_IPV6_FOU) += fou6.o
obj-y += addrconf_core.o exthdrs_core.o ip6_checksum.o ip6_icmp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INET) += output_core.o protocol.o $(ipv6-offload)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 22:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rEYLT-7qa-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1409840 |
On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:25:40 AM CEST Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> your commit fabb13db448e ("fou: add Kconfig options for IPv6 support")
> has shown up in today's linux-next. ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py
> warned because of the following statement in net/ipv6/Makefile:
>
> +obj-$(CONFIG_NET_FOU_IPV6_TUNNELS) += fou6.o
>
> The referenced Kconfig option does not exist, but I assume the right
> option is 'IPV6_FOU_TUNNEL'? In case yes, the modified #if block in
> the commit could be removed (redundant check).
Patch sent now.
Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web