Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1408663 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-29 22:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-31 06:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-05-29 22:30 +0200
Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-05-30 10:00 +0200
Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> - 2016-05-30 13:00 +0200
Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2016-05-30 16:40 +0200
Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library Kui Zhang <kuizhang@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 06:30 +0200
| From | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-29 22:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library |
| Message-ID | <rEfvr-2wx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Andy?
Looking at that commit, it does look like what wmi_parse_guid +
wmi_swap_bytes did was to implement a LE uuid. So the conversion looks
correct, but the fact that it breaks something obviously means that
there's something missing. What's going on?
And dammit, how I hate uuid's and the idiotic byte ordering issue.
It's possibly the only idiotic standard that is even worse than xml.
Linus
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kui Zhang <kuizhang@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After commit 538d7eb86d58 ("drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c: use generic UUID library")
>
> some keyboard functions stopped working:
>
> clevo-wmi - git://git.code.sf.net/p/clevo-wmi/code
> [ 83.877887] Clevo Get GUID not found
>
> /*
> #define CLWMI_GET_GUID "ABBC0F6D-8EA1-11d1-00A0-C90629100000"
>
> ...
> if(!wmi_has_guid(CLWMI_GET_GUID)) {
> pr_err("Clevo Get GUID not found\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
>
> */
>
> clevo-xsm-wmi - https://bitbucket.org/lynthium/clevo-xsm-wmi.git
> insmod: ERROR: could not insert module clevo-xsm-wmi.ko: No such device
>
> /*
>
> #define CLEVO_GET_GUID "ABBC0F6D-8EA1-11D1-00A0-C90629100000"
>
> ...
>
> if (!wmi_has_guid(CLEVO_GET_GUID)) {
> CLEVO_XSM_INFO("No known WMI control method GUID found\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> */
>
>
> thanks
> Kui.Z
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 10:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library |
| Message-ID | <rEqhb-1fU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1408663 |
On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 13:22 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Andy?
>
> Looking at that commit, it does look like what wmi_parse_guid +
> wmi_swap_bytes did was to implement a LE uuid. So the conversion looks
> correct, but the fact that it breaks something obviously means that
> there's something missing. What's going on?
I proposed to add print to the loops to see what's going on there.
>
> And dammit, how I hate uuid's and the idiotic byte ordering issue.
> It's possibly the only idiotic standard that is even worse than xml.
T'so seems has the same opinion http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2
263333.html
>
> Linus
>
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Kui Zhang <kuizhang@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > After commit 538d7eb86d58 ("drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c: use generic
> > UUID library")
> >
> > some keyboard functions stopped working:
> >
> > clevo-wmi - git://git.code.sf.net/p/clevo-wmi/code
> > [ 83.877887] Clevo Get GUID not found
> >
> > /*
> > #define CLWMI_GET_GUID "ABBC0F6D-8EA1-11d1-00A0-C90629100000"
> >
> > ...
> > if(!wmi_has_guid(CLWMI_GET_GUID)) {
> > pr_err("Clevo Get GUID not found\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> >
> > */
> >
> > clevo-xsm-wmi - https://bitbucket.org/lynthium/clevo-xsm-wmi.git
> > insmod: ERROR: could not insert module clevo-xsm-wmi.ko: No such
> > device
> >
> > /*
> >
> > #define CLEVO_GET_GUID "ABBC0F6D-8EA1-11D1-00A0-C90629100000"
> >
> > ...
> >
> > if (!wmi_has_guid(CLEVO_GET_GUID)) {
> > CLEVO_XSM_INFO("No known WMI control method GUID found\n");
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > */
> >
> >
> > thanks
> > Kui.Z
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Bjørn Mork <bjorn@mork.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 13:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rEt5o-33J-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1408834 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
How about the untested attached patch? Bjørn
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 16:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: WMI driver no longer load after switching to generic UUID library |
| Message-ID | <rEwwh-5os-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1408985 |
On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 12:52 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: > How about the untested attached patch? > Facepalm.jpg! Good catch! The question is how it passed in our internal tree without being notified (it even included a lot of ACPI code updated)!? My explanation since I have no access to archive of internal mailing list is that I submitted 'cleaned up' version which brought that and wasn't tested. Anyway I just wrote a test module and is about to submit it with your fix in a series. Thanks! > > Bjørn > -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kui Zhang <kuizhang@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 06:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rEJtv-61m-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1409175 |
Thanks guys. keyboard functions are working now. kui.z On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 12:52 +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote: >> How about the untested attached patch? >> > > Facepalm.jpg! > > Good catch! > > The question is how it passed in our internal tree without being > notified (it even included a lot of ACPI code updated)!? > > My explanation since I have no access to archive of internal mailing > list is that I submitted 'cleaned up' version which brought that and > wasn't tested. > > Anyway I just wrote a test module and is about to submit it with your > fix in a series. > > Thanks! > >> >> Bjørn >> > > -- > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > Intel Finland Oy
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web