Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1409357 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH-RFC]: sysrq-a: graceful reboot via kernel_restart(), similar to sysrq-o

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH-RFC]: sysrq-a: graceful reboot via kernel_restart(),  similar to sysrq-o Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> - 2016-05-30 22:00 +0200

#1409357 — Re: [PATCH-RFC]: sysrq-a: graceful reboot via kernel_restart(), similar to sysrq-o

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:13:13PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:35:21AM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > We were having a discussion on the bcache list about the safest reboot 
> > options via sysrq here:
> >   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.bcache.devel/3559/focus=3586
> > 
> > The result of the discussion ended up in a patch for sysrq-a to call 
> > kernel_restart much in the same way as sysrq-ocalls kernel_power_off.
> > 
> > Please comment on the patch and suggest any appropriate changes.  
> 
> Thanks Eric.
> 
> The quick rationale is that sysrq-r is not desirable  to use if you're using
> bcache, or software raid since it will reboot without giving them a
> chance to properly sync their buffers and get into a clean state.
> 
> I've been using sysrq-o to get a clean shutdown, but of course that
> actually powers off the server, and you then need to rely on something
> like WOL to bring the machine back up, which isn't always easy or
> possible.
> 
> This new reboot with proper flushing (kernel_power_off) allows for safe
> reboots that don't upset bcache or software raid.

Just updated to 4.6 and re-applied Eric sysrq patch.
It's saved me many times already. I absolutely need to do clean reboots
for both my software raid and bcache, and when the system is not doing
well, sysrq-o does the graceful shutdown, but also powers off my server,
which is not what I want.
I've been using the new sysrq-x Eric wrote and it's been working great.

Any chance, we can get this into standard kernels? I can't be the only
person who benefits from this...
Any suggestion on who might be a good person to
review/critique/integrate this patch?

Thanks,
Marc
-- 
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
                                      .... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/                         | PGP 1024R/763BE901

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web