Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1409286 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-30 18:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-31 00:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v3 4/7] perf config: Reimplement perf_config() using perf_config_set__iter() Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2016-05-30 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] perf config: Reimplement perf_config() using perf_config_set__iter() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-05-30 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] perf config: Reimplement perf_config() using perf_config_set__iter() Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> - 2016-05-31 00:30 +0200
| From | Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 18:50 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v3 4/7] perf config: Reimplement perf_config() using perf_config_set__iter() |
| Message-ID | <rEyy6-6IE-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Everytime perf_config() is called, perf_config() always read config files.
(i.e. user config '~/.perfconfig' and system config '$(sysconfdir)/perfconfig')
But we need to use the config set that already contains all config
key-value pairs to avoid this repetitive work reading the config files
in perf_config(). (the config set mean a global variable 'config_set')
In other words, if new perf_config() is called,
only first time 'config_set' is initialized collecting all configs
from the config files and it work with perf_config_set__iter().
And free the config set after sub-command work at run_builtin().
If we do, 'config_set' can be reused wherever using perf_config()
and a feature of old perf_config() is the same as new perf_config() work
without the repetitive work that read the config files.
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
---
tools/perf/perf.c | 1 +
tools/perf/util/cache.h | 1 +
tools/perf/util/config.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/perf.c b/tools/perf/perf.c
index 15982ce..32e54d9 100644
--- a/tools/perf/perf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/perf.c
@@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ static int run_builtin(struct cmd_struct *p, int argc, const char **argv)
perf_env__set_cmdline(&perf_env, argc, argv);
status = p->fn(argc, argv, prefix);
+ perf_config_set__delete();
exit_browser(status);
perf_env__exit(&perf_env);
bpf__clear();
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cache.h b/tools/perf/util/cache.h
index 0d814bb..54bbd55 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cache.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cache.h
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
#include <subcmd/pager.h>
#include "../perf.h"
#include "../ui/ui.h"
+#include "config.h"
#include <linux/string.h>
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/config.c b/tools/perf/util/config.c
index 68def9a..abfe1b2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/config.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/config.c
@@ -478,54 +478,6 @@ static int perf_config_global(void)
return !perf_env_bool("PERF_CONFIG_NOGLOBAL", 0);
}
-int perf_config(config_fn_t fn, void *data)
-{
- int ret = 0, found = 0;
- const char *home = NULL;
-
- /* Setting $PERF_CONFIG makes perf read _only_ the given config file. */
- if (config_exclusive_filename)
- return perf_config_from_file(fn, config_exclusive_filename, data);
- if (perf_config_system() && !access(perf_etc_perfconfig(), R_OK)) {
- ret += perf_config_from_file(fn, perf_etc_perfconfig(),
- data);
- found += 1;
- }
-
- home = getenv("HOME");
- if (perf_config_global() && home) {
- char *user_config = strdup(mkpath("%s/.perfconfig", home));
- struct stat st;
-
- if (user_config == NULL) {
- warning("Not enough memory to process %s/.perfconfig, "
- "ignoring it.", home);
- goto out;
- }
-
- if (stat(user_config, &st) < 0)
- goto out_free;
-
- if (st.st_uid && (st.st_uid != geteuid())) {
- warning("File %s not owned by current user or root, "
- "ignoring it.", user_config);
- goto out_free;
- }
-
- if (!st.st_size)
- goto out_free;
-
- ret += perf_config_from_file(fn, user_config, data);
- found += 1;
-out_free:
- free(user_config);
- }
-out:
- if (found == 0)
- return -1;
- return ret;
-}
-
static struct perf_config_section *find_section(struct list_head *sections,
const char *section_name)
{
@@ -706,6 +658,55 @@ struct perf_config_set *perf_config_set__new(void)
return set;
}
+static int perf_config_set__check(void)
+{
+ if (config_set != NULL)
+ return 0;
+
+ config_set = perf_config_set__new();
+ if (!config_set)
+ return -1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int perf_config_set__iter(struct perf_config_set *set, config_fn_t fn, void *data)
+{
+ struct perf_config_section *section;
+ struct perf_config_item *item;
+ struct list_head *sections;
+ char key[BUFSIZ];
+
+ if (set == NULL)
+ return -1;
+
+ sections = &set->sections;
+ if (list_empty(sections))
+ return -1;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(section, sections, node) {
+ list_for_each_entry(item, §ion->items, node) {
+ char *value = item->value;
+
+ if (value) {
+ scnprintf(key, sizeof(key), "%s.%s",
+ section->name, item->name);
+ if (fn(key, value, data) < 0)
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int perf_config(config_fn_t fn, void *data)
+{
+ if (perf_config_set__check() < 0)
+ return -1;
+ return perf_config_set__iter(config_set, fn, data);
+}
+
static void perf_config_item__delete(struct perf_config_item *item)
{
zfree(&item->name);
--
2.5.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-30 21:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] perf config: Reimplement perf_config() using perf_config_set__iter() |
| Message-ID | <rEBcB-8Y-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1409286 |
Em Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:44:08AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> +static int perf_config_set__iter(struct perf_config_set *set, config_fn_t fn, void *data)
> +{
> + struct perf_config_section *section;
> + struct perf_config_item *item;
> + struct list_head *sections;
> + char key[BUFSIZ];
> +
> + if (set == NULL)
> + return -1;
<SNIP>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +int perf_config(config_fn_t fn, void *data)
> +{
> + if (perf_config_set__check() < 0)
> + return -1;
> + return perf_config_set__iter(config_set, fn, data);
> +}
"check" looks too vague, this is equivalent, no?
int perf_config(config_fn_t, void *data)
{
if (config_set == NULL)
config_set = perf_config_set__new();
return perf_config_set__iter(config_set, fn, data);
}
- Arnaldo
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-31 00:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] perf config: Reimplement perf_config() using perf_config_set__iter() |
| Message-ID | <rEDR7-1Zm-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1409352 |
On 05/31/2016 04:32 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:44:08AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
>> +static int perf_config_set__iter(struct perf_config_set *set, config_fn_t fn, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_config_section *section;
>> + struct perf_config_item *item;
>> + struct list_head *sections;
>> + char key[BUFSIZ];
>> +
>> + if (set == NULL)
>> + return -1;
> <SNIP>
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +int perf_config(config_fn_t fn, void *data)
>> +{
>> + if (perf_config_set__check() < 0)
>> + return -1;
>> + return perf_config_set__iter(config_set, fn, data);
>> +}
>
> "check" looks too vague, this is equivalent, no?
>
> int perf_config(config_fn_t, void *data)
> {
> if (config_set == NULL)
> config_set = perf_config_set__new();
>
> return perf_config_set__iter(config_set, fn, data);
> }
>
I understood it! I thought __check() function is needed for readability.
But I'll remove __check() because it would seem that the function isn't
needed as you said.
Thanks,
Taeung
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web