Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1408385 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-28 09:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-28 12:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [i2c: dev] d6760b14d4: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in of_device_uevent at addr ffff8800091b4c49 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-05-28 09:20 +0200
Re: [i2c: dev] d6760b14d4: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in of_device_uevent at addr ffff8800091b4c49 Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2016-05-28 09:30 +0200
Re: [i2c: dev] d6760b14d4: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in of_device_uevent at addr ffff8800091b4c49 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-05-28 09:40 +0200
Re: [i2c: dev] d6760b14d4: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in of_device_uevent at addr ffff8800091b4c49 Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> - 2016-05-28 12:20 +0200
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-28 09:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [i2c: dev] d6760b14d4: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in of_device_uevent at addr ffff8800091b4c49 |
| Message-ID | <rDGHo-5Xm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master So, I got a success message from buildbot "[wsa:i2c/for-next] 72a71f869c95dc11b73f09fe18c593d4a0618c3f BUILD SUCCESS". I assume now that the above message covers only compile-testing while linus master tree also gets boot testing? Correct? I was under the impression before that the above message also covers simple boot tests. Thanks, Wolfram
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-28 09:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rDGR4-60j-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1408385 |
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 09:12:34AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > So, I got a success message from buildbot "[wsa:i2c/for-next] > 72a71f869c95dc11b73f09fe18c593d4a0618c3f BUILD SUCCESS". > > I assume now that the above message covers only compile-testing while That's right. "BUILD SUCCESS" only covers compile testing and static checks. > linus master tree also gets boot testing? Correct? All branches will get boot testing. linus/master naturally receives much more tests since all branches are eventually based on some Linus commit. > I was under the impression before that the above message also covers > simple boot tests. There will be simple boot tests quickly after the compile tests. However boot tests typically need more time to be detected, bisected and especially manual checked. We are yet to automate more boot error reports. Thanks, Fengguang
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-28 09:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rDH0J-63f-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1408386 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> There will be simple boot tests quickly after the compile tests. > However boot tests typically need more time to be detected, bisected > and especially manual checked. We are yet to automate more boot error > reports. Thanks for the heads up. Could there be success mails for boot tests, too?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-28 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rDJvA-7EI-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1408387 |
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 09:32:17AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > There will be simple boot tests quickly after the compile tests. > > However boot tests typically need more time to be detected, bisected > > and especially manual checked. We are yet to automate more boot error > > reports. > > Thanks for the heads up. Could there be success mails for boot tests, > too? That may be too noisy to be useful. Boot errors may not be well reproducible, may take different forms, and the base trees are typically not clean -- even mainline tree has regular errors, for example, here are the runtime error ids in kernel v4.6 with kconfig x86_64-rhel: boot_successes: 1470 boot_failures: 154 BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_kernel/irq/manage.c: 102 WARNING:at_drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:#intel_modeset_init[i915]: 4 drm:fw_domains_get[i915]]: 57 drm:__gen6_gt_wait_for_thread_c0[i915]]: 57 BUG:kernel_test_crashed: 4 invoked_oom-killer:gfp_mask=0x: 22 Mem-Info: 22 Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Out_of_memory_and_no_killable_processes: 18 invalid_opcode:#[##]SMP: 3 RIP:ftrace_stub: 16 Kernel_panic-not_syncing:Fatal_exception: 16 BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel: 13 Oops: 13 Out_of_memory:Kill_process: 4 However if you are still interested, we can try composing auto runtime test report emails. Thanks, Fengguang
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web