Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1406617 > unrolled thread

[RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment not to affect dma-coherent

Started byJaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
First post2016-05-25 06:40 +0200
Last post2016-05-27 10:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment  not to affect dma-coherent Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> - 2016-05-25 06:40 +0200
    Re: [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA  alignment not to affect dma-coherent Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2016-05-25 16:40 +0200
      Re: [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA  alignment not to affect dma-coherent Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> - 2016-05-27 10:00 +0200

#1406617 — [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment not to affect dma-coherent

FromJaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
Date2016-05-25 06:40 +0200
Subject[RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment not to affect dma-coherent
Message-ID<rCyLT-4WT-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Jaewon <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>

There was an alignment mismatch issue for CMA and it was fixed by
commit 1cc8e3458b51 ("drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the alignment with CMA setup").
However the way of the commit considers not only dma-contiguous(CMA) but also
dma-coherent which has no that requirement.

This patch checks more to distinguish dma-contiguous(CMA) from dma-coherent.

Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
index ed01c01..45b873e 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
@@ -127,7 +127,10 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_alloc_size(unsigned long node,
 	}
 
 	/* Need adjust the alignment to satisfy the CMA requirement */
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA) && of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "shared-dma-pool"))
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA)
+	    && of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "shared-dma-pool")
+	    && of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reusable", NULL)
+	    && !of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "no-map", NULL)) {
 		align = max(align, (phys_addr_t)PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order));
 
 	prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "alloc-ranges", &len);
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1406953 — Re: [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment not to affect dma-coherent

FromRob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date2016-05-25 16:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment not to affect dma-coherent
Message-ID<rCI8x-25o-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1406617
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> From: Jaewon <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
>
> There was an alignment mismatch issue for CMA and it was fixed by
> commit 1cc8e3458b51 ("drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the alignment with CMA setup").
> However the way of the commit considers not only dma-contiguous(CMA) but also
> dma-coherent which has no that requirement.
>
> This patch checks more to distinguish dma-contiguous(CMA) from dma-coherent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>

I suppose this needs to go to stable? If so, adding the stable tag and
kernel version would be nice so I don't have to.

> ---
>  drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

I'm looking for an ack from Marek on this.

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1407886 — Re: [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment not to affect dma-coherent

FromMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Date2016-05-27 10:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [RESEND][PATCH] drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the CMA alignment not to affect dma-coherent
Message-ID<rDkQx-BQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1406953
Hello,


On 2016-05-25 16:38, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:29 PM, Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> From: Jaewon <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
>>
>> There was an alignment mismatch issue for CMA and it was fixed by
>> commit 1cc8e3458b51 ("drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the alignment with CMA setup").
>> However the way of the commit considers not only dma-contiguous(CMA) but also
>> dma-coherent which has no that requirement.
>>
>> This patch checks more to distinguish dma-contiguous(CMA) from dma-coherent.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31.kim@samsung.com>
> I suppose this needs to go to stable? If so, adding the stable tag and
> kernel version would be nice so I don't have to.
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 5 ++++-
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> I'm looking for an ack from Marek on this.

Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web