Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1350976 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2016-03-05 22:30 +0100
Last post2016-03-06 21:10 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-03-05 22:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 14:00 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-03-06 15:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com> - 2016-03-06 21:10 +0100

#1350976 — Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-03-05 22:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/8] fix debugfs file removal races
Message-ID<r9rVV-3Em-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
> patch [4/8].
> 
> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
> review yet.

Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1351116

FromNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-06 14:00 +0100
Message-ID<r9GrU-57F-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1350976
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
>> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
>> patch [4/8].
>> 
>> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
>> review yet.
>
> Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
> let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)

Great, thank you!

Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
sent v5 in order to correct this.

In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.

Best,

Nicolai

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1351123

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-03-06 15:00 +0100
Message-ID<r9HnY-5KW-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1351116
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
> >> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
> >> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
> >> patch [4/8].
> >> 
> >> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
> >> review yet.
> >
> > Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
> > let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
> 
> Great, thank you!
> 
> Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
> sent v5 in order to correct this.
> 
> In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
> know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.

What do the fixup patches look like?  That might be easier to take if
they aren't really major issues (one was a documentation issue, which
isn't a big deal...)

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1351189

FromNicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Date2016-03-06 21:10 +0100
Message-ID<r9Na3-1n4-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1351123
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:54:40PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>> 
>> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 02:51:25PM +0100, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> >> The changes from v3 to v4 are style changes regarding the Coccinelle
>> >> part only -- it has been split off from former [3/7] into its own
>> >> patch [4/8].
>> >> 
>> >> The big step has been from v2 to v3 and these changes haven't got any
>> >> review yet.
>> >
>> > Well, given that they look sane to me, I've applied them to my tree,
>> > let's see what breaks in linux-next now :)
>> 
>> Great, thank you!
>> 
>> Unfortunately, the kbuild test robot detected two minor issues and I've
>> sent v5 in order to correct this.
>> 
>> In case that it isn't possible to simply replace v4 by v5, please let me
>> know and I'll send two fixup patches instead.
>
> What do the fixup patches look like?  That might be easier to take if
> they aren't really major issues (one was a documentation issue, which
> isn't a big deal...)

I sent the two fixup patches as a proposal in a series of their own:
http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1457294345-4588-1-git-send-email-nicstange@gmail.com

Thank you!

Nicolai

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web