Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1350570 > unrolled thread

[PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking

Started bySuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
First post2016-03-04 21:50 +0100
Last post2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2016-03-04 21:50 +0100
    Re: [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU  blocking/unblocking Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-03-07 16:50 +0100
      Re: [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU  blocking/unblocking Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2016-03-14 07:30 +0100

#1350570 — [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking

FromSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date2016-03-04 21:50 +0100
Subject[PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking
Message-ID<r94PE-3Vt-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
This patch add new function hooks to the struct kvm_x86_ops,
and calling them from the kvm_arch_vcpu[blocking/unblocking].

This will be used later on by SVM AVIC code.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 arch/x86/kvm/svm.c              | 12 ++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 44adbb8..9a61669 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -969,6 +969,10 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops {
 	 */
 	int (*pre_block)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	void (*post_block)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+	void (*vcpu_blocking)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+	void (*vcpu_unblocking)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
 	int (*update_pi_irte)(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int host_irq,
 			      uint32_t guest_irq, bool set);
 };
@@ -1320,7 +1324,16 @@ bool kvm_intr_is_single_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq,
 void kvm_set_msi_irq(struct kvm_kernel_irq_routing_entry *e,
 		     struct kvm_lapic_irq *irq);
 
-static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
-static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
+static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_blocking)
+		kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_blocking(vcpu);
+}
+
+static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_unblocking)
+		kvm_x86_ops->vcpu_unblocking(vcpu);
+}
 
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_KVM_HOST_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index c13a64b..28f8618 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -1265,6 +1265,16 @@ static void svm_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		wrmsrl(host_save_user_msrs[i], svm->host_user_msrs[i]);
 }
 
+static void svm_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	avic_set_running(vcpu, false);
+}
+
+static void svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	avic_set_running(vcpu, true);
+}
+
 static unsigned long svm_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	return to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.rflags;
@@ -4321,6 +4331,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
 	.prepare_guest_switch = svm_prepare_guest_switch,
 	.vcpu_load = svm_vcpu_load,
 	.vcpu_put = svm_vcpu_put,
+	.vcpu_blocking = svm_vcpu_blocking,
+	.vcpu_unblocking = svm_vcpu_unblocking,
 
 	.update_bp_intercept = update_bp_intercept,
 	.get_msr = svm_get_msr,
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1351735 — Re: [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking

FromPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date2016-03-07 16:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking
Message-ID<ra5zZ-4I3-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1350570

On 04/03/2016 21:46, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>  
> +static void svm_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	avic_set_running(vcpu, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	avic_set_running(vcpu, true);
> +}
> +
>  static unsigned long svm_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	return to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.rflags;
> @@ -4321,6 +4331,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
>  	.prepare_guest_switch = svm_prepare_guest_switch,
>  	.vcpu_load = svm_vcpu_load,
>  	.vcpu_put = svm_vcpu_put,
> +	.vcpu_blocking = svm_vcpu_blocking,
> +	.vcpu_unblocking = svm_vcpu_unblocking,

These two hunks should be added to patch 10.

Paolo

>  	.update_bp_intercept = update_bp_intercept,
>  	.get_msr = svm_get_msr,

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1356962 — Re: [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking

FromSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date2016-03-14 07:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PART1 RFC v2 02/10] KVM: x86: Introducing kvm_x86_ops VCPU blocking/unblocking
Message-ID<rcuaS-8sW-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1351735
Hi

On 03/07/2016 10:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 04/03/2016 21:46, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> >
>> >+static void svm_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> >+{
>> >+	avic_set_running(vcpu, false);
>> >+}
>> >+
>> >+static void svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> >+{
>> >+	avic_set_running(vcpu, true);
>> >+}
>> >+
>> >  static unsigned long svm_get_rflags(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> >  {
>> >  	return to_svm(vcpu)->vmcb->save.rflags;
>> >@@ -4321,6 +4331,8 @@ static struct kvm_x86_ops svm_x86_ops = {
>> >  	.prepare_guest_switch = svm_prepare_guest_switch,
>> >  	.vcpu_load = svm_vcpu_load,
>> >  	.vcpu_put = svm_vcpu_put,
>> >+	.vcpu_blocking = svm_vcpu_blocking,
>> >+	.vcpu_unblocking = svm_vcpu_unblocking,
> These two hunks should be added to patch 10.
>
> Paolo
>

Right. Fixed. Thanks for catching this.

Suravee

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web