Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1350123 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during runtime resume

Started byUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
First post2016-03-04 11:30 +0100
Last post2016-03-04 22:30 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during  runtime resume Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> - 2016-03-04 11:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during runtime resume Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> - 2016-03-04 21:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during  runtime resume "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2016-03-04 22:30 +0100

#1350123 — Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during runtime resume

FromUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date2016-03-04 11:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during runtime resume
Message-ID<r8V9E-5bS-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 2 March 2016 at 00:20, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> During runtime resume the return values of the start and restore steps
> are ignored. As a result drivers are not notified of runtime resume
> failures and can't propagate them up. Fix it by returning an error if
> either the start or restore step fails, and clean up properly in the
> error path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> This fixes an issue I've noticed with my driver's .runtime_resume() handler
> returning an error that was never propagated out of pm_runtime_get_sync().
>
> A second issue then appeared. The device .runtime_error field is set to the
> error code returned by my .runtime_resume() handler, but it never reset. Any
> subsequent try to resume the device fails with -EINVAL. I'm not sure what the
> right way to solve that is, advices are welcome.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> index 301b785f9f56..8cfcb8d6179b 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> @@ -485,8 +485,13 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>         if (timed && runtime_pm)
>                 time_start = ktime_get();
>
> -       genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
> -       genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev);
> +       ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err_poweroff;
> +
> +       ret = genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev);
> +       if (ret)
> +               goto err_stop;
>
>         /* Update resume latency value if the measured time exceeds it. */
>         if (timed && runtime_pm) {
> @@ -501,6 +506,17 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>         }
>
>         return 0;
> +
> +err_stop:
> +       genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
> +err_poweroff:
> +       if (!dev->power.irq_safe) {

There's a helper function for this:
pm_runtime_is_irq_safe()

Perhaps, we can leave this as is here and then make a separate patch
converting all occurrences of the above into using the helper function
instead.

> +               mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
> +               genpd_poweroff(genpd, 0);
> +               mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
> +       }
> +
> +       return ret;
>  }
>
>  static bool pd_ignore_unused;

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1350567 — Re: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during runtime resume

FromLaurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Date2016-03-04 21:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] PM / Domains: Propagate start and restore errors during runtime resume
Message-ID<r94FX-3Op-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1350123
Hi Ulf,

Thank you for the review.

On Friday 04 March 2016 11:22:49 Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 2 March 2016 at 00:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > During runtime resume the return values of the start and restore steps
> > are ignored. As a result drivers are not notified of runtime resume
> > failures and can't propagate them up. Fix it by returning an error if
> > either the start or restore step fails, and clean up properly in the
> > error path.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > This fixes an issue I've noticed with my driver's .runtime_resume()
> > handler returning an error that was never propagated out of
> > pm_runtime_get_sync().
> > 
> > A second issue then appeared. The device .runtime_error field is set to
> > the error code returned by my .runtime_resume() handler, but it never
> > reset. Any subsequent try to resume the device fails with -EINVAL. I'm not
> > sure what the right way to solve that is, advices are welcome.
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > index 301b785f9f56..8cfcb8d6179b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
> > @@ -485,8 +485,13 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device
> > *dev)
> >         if (timed && runtime_pm)
> >                 time_start = ktime_get();
> > 
> > -       genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
> > -       genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev);
> > +       ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               goto err_poweroff;
> > +
> > +       ret = genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev);
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               goto err_stop;
> > 
> >         /* Update resume latency value if the measured time exceeds it. */
> >         if (timed && runtime_pm) {
> > @@ -501,6 +506,17 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device
> > *dev)
> >         }
> >         
> >         return 0;
> > +
> > +err_stop:
> > +       genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
> > +err_poweroff:
> > +       if (!dev->power.irq_safe) {
> 
> There's a helper function for this:
> pm_runtime_is_irq_safe()
> 
> Perhaps, we can leave this as is here and then make a separate patch
> converting all occurrences of the above into using the helper function
> instead.

If there are other occurrences a separate patch would make sense, I agree.

> > +               mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
> > +               genpd_poweroff(genpd, 0);
> > +               mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       return ret;
> > 
> >  }
> >  
> >  static bool pd_ignore_unused;
> 
> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Thank you. Do you plan to take the patch in your tree for v4.6 ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1350602

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date2016-03-04 22:30 +0100
Message-ID<r95sm-4wI-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1350567
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
> On Friday 04 March 2016 11:22:49 Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 2 March 2016 at 00:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > During runtime resume the return values of the start and restore steps
>> > are ignored. As a result drivers are not notified of runtime resume
>> > failures and can't propagate them up. Fix it by returning an error if
>> > either the start or restore step fails, and clean up properly in the
>> > error path.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
>> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>> > ---
>> >
>> >  drivers/base/power/domain.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>> >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > This fixes an issue I've noticed with my driver's .runtime_resume()
>> > handler returning an error that was never propagated out of
>> > pm_runtime_get_sync().
>> >
>> > A second issue then appeared. The device .runtime_error field is set to
>> > the error code returned by my .runtime_resume() handler, but it never
>> > reset. Any subsequent try to resume the device fails with -EINVAL. I'm not
>> > sure what the right way to solve that is, advices are welcome.
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/domain.c b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> > index 301b785f9f56..8cfcb8d6179b 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/base/power/domain.c
>> > @@ -485,8 +485,13 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device
>> > *dev)
>> >         if (timed && runtime_pm)
>> >                 time_start = ktime_get();
>> >
>> > -       genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
>> > -       genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev);
>> > +       ret = genpd_start_dev(genpd, dev);
>> > +       if (ret)
>> > +               goto err_poweroff;
>> > +
>> > +       ret = genpd_restore_dev(genpd, dev);
>> > +       if (ret)
>> > +               goto err_stop;
>> >
>> >         /* Update resume latency value if the measured time exceeds it. */
>> >         if (timed && runtime_pm) {
>> > @@ -501,6 +506,17 @@ static int pm_genpd_runtime_resume(struct device
>> > *dev)
>> >         }
>> >
>> >         return 0;
>> > +
>> > +err_stop:
>> > +       genpd_stop_dev(genpd, dev);
>> > +err_poweroff:
>> > +       if (!dev->power.irq_safe) {
>>
>> There's a helper function for this:
>> pm_runtime_is_irq_safe()
>>
>> Perhaps, we can leave this as is here and then make a separate patch
>> converting all occurrences of the above into using the helper function
>> instead.
>
> If there are other occurrences a separate patch would make sense, I agree.
>
>> > +               mutex_lock(&genpd->lock);
>> > +               genpd_poweroff(genpd, 0);
>> > +               mutex_unlock(&genpd->lock);
>> > +       }
>> > +
>> > +       return ret;
>> >
>> >  }
>> >
>> >  static bool pd_ignore_unused;
>>
>> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>
> Thank you. Do you plan to take the patch in your tree for v4.6 ?

I'll do that.

Thanks,
Rafael

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web