Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1348002 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-02 13:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-02 16:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
a question about slub in function __slab_free() Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-02 13:40 +0100
Re: a question about slub in function __slab_free() Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 15:40 +0100
Re: a question about slub in function __slab_free() Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2016-03-03 02:40 +0100
Re: a question about slub in function __slab_free() Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com> - 2016-03-02 16:20 +0100
| From | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 13:40 +0100 |
| Subject | a question about slub in function __slab_free() |
| Message-ID | <r8eel-7A8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
___slab_alloc() deactivate_slab() add_full(s, n, page); The page will be added to full list and the frozen is 0, right? __slab_free() prior = page->freelist; // prior is NULL was_frozen = new.frozen; // was_frozen is 0 ... /* * Slab was on no list before and will be * partially empty * We can defer the list move and instead * freeze it. */ new.frozen = 1; ... I don't understand why "Slab was on no list before"? Thanks, Xishi Qiu
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8g6u-uK-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1348002 |
2016-03-02 21:26 GMT+09:00 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>: > ___slab_alloc() > deactivate_slab() > add_full(s, n, page); > The page will be added to full list and the frozen is 0, right? > > __slab_free() > prior = page->freelist; // prior is NULL > was_frozen = new.frozen; // was_frozen is 0 > ... > /* > * Slab was on no list before and will be > * partially empty > * We can defer the list move and instead > * freeze it. > */ > new.frozen = 1; > ... > > I don't understand why "Slab was on no list before"? add_full() is defined only for CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. And, actual add happens if slub_debug=u is enabled. In other cases, fully used slab isn't attached on any list. Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 02:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8qpb-89F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1348090 |
On 2016/3/2 22:38, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > 2016-03-02 21:26 GMT+09:00 Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>: >> ___slab_alloc() >> deactivate_slab() >> add_full(s, n, page); >> The page will be added to full list and the frozen is 0, right? >> >> __slab_free() >> prior = page->freelist; // prior is NULL >> was_frozen = new.frozen; // was_frozen is 0 >> ... >> /* >> * Slab was on no list before and will be >> * partially empty >> * We can defer the list move and instead >> * freeze it. >> */ >> new.frozen = 1; >> ... >> >> I don't understand why "Slab was on no list before"? > > add_full() is defined only for CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG. > And, actual add happens if slub_debug=u is enabled. > In other cases, fully used slab isn't attached on any list. > > Thanks. > Hi Joonsoo, You are right, thank you very much! >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-02 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8gJe-Yz-61@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1348002 |
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> wrote: > __slab_free() > prior = page->freelist; // prior is NULL > was_frozen = new.frozen; // was_frozen is 0 > ... > /* > * Slab was on no list before and will be > * partially empty > * We can defer the list move and instead > * freeze it. > */ > new.frozen = 1; > ... > > I don't understand why "Slab was on no list before"? in this __slab_free() code path, we are freeing an object to a remote CPU. Consider the condition that leads to this branch, that is: new.inuse && !prior && !was_frozen new.inuse means that slab page has free objects after we do this free operiton. !prior && !was_frozen together means that slab page has previously depleted all objects and forgotten(SLUB don't remember a slab page that has got all its object allocated). All these 3 conditions mean that, A slab page on a remote CPU has got all tis objects allocated and it was forgotten by SLUB, so "Slab was on no list before", and then at the present, we (on local CPU) are freeing object back to that CPU, that "will make the slab page partially empty". But we don't bother to immediately add it back to the node partial list( to avoid the list->lock contention), so "we can defer the list move". But how do we handle this? Easy, just mark it frozen, and latter that CPU's per-cpu freelist queue will use it. Regards, Jianyu Zhan
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web