Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1347013 > unrolled thread

linux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-03-01 21:50 +0100
Last post2016-03-03 23:50 +0100
Articles 5 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-01 21:50 +0100
    Re: linux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-02 15:40 +0100
      Re: linux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-02 21:40 +0100
        Re: linux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-03 11:20 +0100
          Re: linux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-03 23:50 +0100

#1347013 — linux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-03-01 21:50 +0100
Subjectlinux-next: unsigned commits in tpmdd tree
Message-ID<r7Zp0-5Vk-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Jarkko,

All the new commits in you tree today have no Signed-off-by from you as
the committer.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1348094

FromJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-03-02 15:40 +0100
Message-ID<r8g6u-uK-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1347013
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:42:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
> 
> All the new commits in you tree today have no Signed-off-by from you as
> the committer.

Oops :( This is my mistake. Do you want me to do git reverts and redo
commits?

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

/Jarkko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1348465

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-03-02 21:40 +0100
Message-ID<r8lIS-4R2-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1348094
Hi Jarkko,

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:29:56 +0200 Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:42:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Jarkko,
> > 
> > All the new commits in you tree today have no Signed-off-by from you as
> > the committer.  
> 
> Oops :( This is my mistake. Do you want me to do git reverts and redo
> commits?

Reverting doesn't really fix the problem (since eth original commits
would still be there), you would have to rebase (maybe onto the same
base commit) all the commits and add the Signed-off-by lines.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1348947

FromJarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-03-03 11:20 +0100
Message-ID<r8ywp-5u3-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1348465
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 07:34:41AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
> 
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 16:29:56 +0200 Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 07:42:18AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Jarkko,
> > > 
> > > All the new commits in you tree today have no Signed-off-by from you as
> > > the committer.  
> > 
> > Oops :( This is my mistake. Do you want me to do git reverts and redo
> > commits?
> 
> Reverting doesn't really fix the problem (since eth original commits
> would still be there), you would have to rebase (maybe onto the same
> base commit) all the commits and add the Signed-off-by lines.

They are now rebased.

> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

/Jarkko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1349659

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-03-03 23:50 +0100
Message-ID<r8Kee-5DY-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1348947
Hi Jarkko,

On Thu, 3 Mar 2016 12:14:13 +0200 Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> They are now rebased.

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web