Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1347731 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 0/2] phy: rcar-gen2, rcar-gen3-usb2: add fallback binding

Started bySimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
First post2016-03-02 03:40 +0100
Last post2016-03-03 01:20 +0100
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH 0/2] phy: rcar-gen2, rcar-gen3-usb2: add fallback binding Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> - 2016-03-02 03:40 +0100
    [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> - 2016-03-02 03:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2016-03-02 10:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> - 2016-03-03 01:20 +0100

#1347731 — [PATCH 0/2] phy: rcar-gen2, rcar-gen3-usb2: add fallback binding

FromSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Date2016-03-02 03:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH 0/2] phy: rcar-gen2, rcar-gen3-usb2: add fallback binding
Message-ID<r84RJ-1dc-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
Add fallback compatibility strings for rcar phy drivers.

In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of
SoCs, e.g. Gen 2 and Gen 3. But beyond that its not clear what the
relationship between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that
r8a7790 is older than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a
descendant of the former or vice versa.

We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the
hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears
to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation.

For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a
per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for
drivers for Renesas SoCs.

Based on v4.5-rc1

Simon Horman (2):
  phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding
  phy: rcar-gen3-usb2: add fallback binding

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt      |  8 +++++++-
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen3-phy-usb2.txt | 10 ++++++++--
 drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c                                  |  1 +
 drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c                             |  1 +
 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1347736 — [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding

FromSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Date2016-03-02 03:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding
Message-ID<r84RK-1dc-73@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1347731
In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of
SoCs, e.g. Gen 2 and Gen 3. But beyond that its not clear what the
relationship between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that
r8a7790 is older than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a
descendant of the former or vice versa.

We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the
hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears
to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation.

For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a
per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for
drivers for Renesas SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt | 8 +++++++-
 drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c                             | 1 +
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
index d564ba4f1cf6..f1102ee464fb 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
@@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ Required properties:
 - compatible: "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790" if the device is a part of R8A7790 SoC.
 	      "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7791" if the device is a part of R8A7791 SoC.
 	      "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7794" if the device is a part of R8A7794 SoC.
+	      "renesas,usb-phy-gen2" for a generic R-Car Gen2 compatible device.
+
+	      When compatible with the generic version, nodes must list the
+	      SoC-specific version corresponding to the platform first
+	      followed by the generic version.
+
 - reg: offset and length of the register block.
 - #address-cells: number of address cells for the USB channel subnodes, must
 		  be <1>.
@@ -34,7 +40,7 @@ the USB channel; see the selector meanings below:
 Example (Lager board):
 
 	usb-phy@e6590100 {
-		compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790";
+		compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790","renesas,usb-phy-gen2";
 		reg = <0 0xe6590100 0 0x100>;
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <0>;
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c
index c7a05996d5c1..e10d326d51e7 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rcar-gen2.c
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id rcar_gen2_phy_match_table[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790" },
 	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7791" },
 	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7794" },
+	{ .compatible = "renesas,usb-phy-gen2" },
 	{ }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rcar_gen2_phy_match_table);
-- 
2.1.4

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1347895 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding

FromGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date2016-03-02 10:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding
Message-ID<r8bqc-5KC-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1347736
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of
> SoCs, e.g. Gen 2 and Gen 3. But beyond that its not clear what the
> relationship between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that
> r8a7790 is older than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a
> descendant of the former or vice versa.
>
> We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the
> hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears
> to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation.
>
> For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a
> per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for
> drivers for Renesas SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
> @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ Required properties:
>  - compatible: "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790" if the device is a part of R8A7790 SoC.
>               "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7791" if the device is a part of R8A7791 SoC.
>               "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7794" if the device is a part of R8A7794 SoC.
> +             "renesas,usb-phy-gen2" for a generic R-Car Gen2 compatible device.

"renesas,rcar-gen2-usb-phy"?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1348635 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding

FromSimon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Date2016-03-03 01:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] phy: rcar-gen2: add fallback binding
Message-ID<r8p9M-7js-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1347895
On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 10:37:31AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > In the case of Renesas R-Car hardware we know that there are generations of
> > SoCs, e.g. Gen 2 and Gen 3. But beyond that its not clear what the
> > relationship between IP blocks might be. For example, I believe that
> > r8a7790 is older than r8a7791 but that doesn't imply that the latter is a
> > descendant of the former or vice versa.
> >
> > We can, however, by examining the documentation and behaviour of the
> > hardware at run-time observe that the current driver implementation appears
> > to be compatible with the IP blocks on SoCs within a given generation.
> >
> > For the above reasons and convenience when enabling new SoCs a
> > per-generation fallback compatibility string scheme being adopted for
> > drivers for Renesas SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> 
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/rcar-gen2-phy.txt
> > @@ -7,6 +7,12 @@ Required properties:
> >  - compatible: "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7790" if the device is a part of R8A7790 SoC.
> >               "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7791" if the device is a part of R8A7791 SoC.
> >               "renesas,usb-phy-r8a7794" if the device is a part of R8A7794 SoC.
> > +             "renesas,usb-phy-gen2" for a generic R-Car Gen2 compatible device.
> 
> "renesas,rcar-gen2-usb-phy"?

I seem to always get these backwards first go :(

I'll update this and the following patch as you suggest.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web