Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1349323 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-03 17:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-04 06:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] ovl: copy new uid/gid into overlayfs runtime inode Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2016-03-03 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ovl: copy new uid/gid into overlayfs runtime inode Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-03 20:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ovl: copy new uid/gid into overlayfs runtime inode Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> - 2016-03-04 06:10 +0100
| From | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 17:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ovl: copy new uid/gid into overlayfs runtime inode |
| Message-ID | <r8DZ9-19t-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> wrote: > Overlayfs must update uid/gid after chown, otherwise functions > like inode_owner_or_capable() will check user against stale uid. > Catched by xfstests generic/087, it chowns file and calls utimes. Queued up patch. Thanks. Miklos
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 20:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8GDD-2P0-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1349323 |
On 3/3/16, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Overlayfs must update uid/gid after chown, otherwise functions >> like inode_owner_or_capable() will check user against stale uid. >> Catched by xfstests generic/087, it chowns file and calls utimes. > > Queued up patch. Thanks. > In which Git tree you do that? [1] points to [2], still true? - Sedat - [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/MAINTAINERS#n8110 [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git/ > Miklos > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-04 06:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r8Q9X-1D7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1349484 |
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote: > On 3/3/16, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Overlayfs must update uid/gid after chown, otherwise functions >>> like inode_owner_or_capable() will check user against stale uid. >>> Catched by xfstests generic/087, it chowns file and calls utimes. >> >> Queued up patch. Thanks. >> > > In which Git tree you do that? > [1] points to [2], still true? It is. I just forgot to push yesterday evening. Pushed now. Thanks, Miklos > > - Sedat - > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/MAINTAINERS#n8110 > [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git/ >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web