Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1349350 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michal Feix <michal@feix.cz> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-03 17:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-03 17:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Kernel stability on baytrail machines Michal Feix <michal@feix.cz> - 2016-03-03 17:50 +0100
| From | Michal Feix <michal@feix.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-03 17:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Kernel stability on baytrail machines |
| Message-ID | <r8EBQ-1uF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello everyone, aprox. 6 months ago I started facing random freezes on my baytrail based computers I manage. It took me a while before I found a bug report in freedesktop bugzilla named "complete freeze after: drm/i915/vlv: WA for Turbo and RC6 to work together" - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88012. It took a few more months for this bug to escalate into MAJOR importance and was later moved into kernel bugzilla as "intel_idle.max_cstate=1 required on baytrail to prevent crashes" - https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051. Based on the ammount of comments in both bugtickets and probably connected observations on different linux distros forums, this seems to be a showstopper on mainstream Baytrail based machines for many users. I'm trying to understand, how visible (and thus important) is this instability across baytrail machines on linux kernel across population. I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much current linux kernel is supposed to be stable on general baytrail machines? Cheers, -- Michael
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web