Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1349350 > unrolled thread

Kernel stability on baytrail machines

Started byMichal Feix <michal@feix.cz>
First post2016-03-03 17:50 +0100
Last post2016-03-03 17:50 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  Kernel stability on baytrail machines Michal Feix <michal@feix.cz> - 2016-03-03 17:50 +0100

#1349350 — Kernel stability on baytrail machines

FromMichal Feix <michal@feix.cz>
Date2016-03-03 17:50 +0100
SubjectKernel stability on baytrail machines
Message-ID<r8EBQ-1uF-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello everyone,

aprox. 6 months ago I started facing random freezes on my baytrail based 
computers I manage. It took me a while before I found a bug report in 
freedesktop bugzilla named "complete freeze after: drm/i915/vlv: WA for 
Turbo and RC6 to work together" - 
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88012. It took a few more 
months for this bug to escalate into MAJOR importance and was later 
moved into kernel bugzilla as "intel_idle.max_cstate=1 required on 
baytrail to prevent crashes" - 
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109051.

Based on the ammount of comments in both bugtickets and probably 
connected observations on different linux distros forums, this seems to 
be a showstopper on mainstream Baytrail based machines for many users. 
I'm trying to understand, how visible (and thus important) is this 
instability across baytrail machines on linux kernel across population.

I do feel that the importance of the mentioned bug is currently 
underestimated. Can anyone here give a note, how much current linux 
kernel is supposed to be stable on general baytrail machines?

Cheers,

-- 
Michael

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web