Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1347454 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 4.4 081/342] mm: thp: fix SMP race condition between THP page fault and MADV_DONTNEED

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2016-03-02 02:20 +0100
Last post2016-03-02 02:20 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 4.4 081/342] mm: thp: fix SMP race condition between THP page fault and MADV_DONTNEED Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-03-02 02:20 +0100

#1347454 — [PATCH 4.4 081/342] mm: thp: fix SMP race condition between THP page fault and MADV_DONTNEED

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-03-02 02:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH 4.4 081/342] mm: thp: fix SMP race condition between THP page fault and MADV_DONTNEED
Message-ID<r83Ck-jE-69@gated-at.bofh.it>
4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>

commit ad33bb04b2a6cee6c1f99fabb15cddbf93ff0433 upstream.

pmd_trans_unstable()/pmd_none_or_trans_huge_or_clear_bad() were
introduced to locklessy (but atomically) detect when a pmd is a regular
(stable) pmd or when the pmd is unstable and can infinitely transition
from pmd_none() and pmd_trans_huge() from under us, while only holding
the mmap_sem for reading (for writing not).

While holding the mmap_sem only for reading, MADV_DONTNEED can run from
under us and so before we can assume the pmd to be a regular stable pmd
we need to compare it against pmd_none() and pmd_trans_huge() in an
atomic way, with pmd_trans_unstable().  The old pmd_trans_huge() left a
tiny window for a race.

Useful applications are unlikely to notice the difference as doing
MADV_DONTNEED concurrently with a page fault would lead to undefined
behavior.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: tidy up comment grammar/layout]
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/memory.c |   14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3399,8 +3399,18 @@ static int __handle_mm_fault(struct mm_s
 	if (unlikely(pmd_none(*pmd)) &&
 	    unlikely(__pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, address)))
 		return VM_FAULT_OOM;
-	/* if an huge pmd materialized from under us just retry later */
-	if (unlikely(pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)))
+	/*
+	 * If a huge pmd materialized under us just retry later.  Use
+	 * pmd_trans_unstable() instead of pmd_trans_huge() to ensure the pmd
+	 * didn't become pmd_trans_huge under us and then back to pmd_none, as
+	 * a result of MADV_DONTNEED running immediately after a huge pmd fault
+	 * in a different thread of this mm, in turn leading to a misleading
+	 * pmd_trans_huge() retval.  All we have to ensure is that it is a
+	 * regular pmd that we can walk with pte_offset_map() and we can do that
+	 * through an atomic read in C, which is what pmd_trans_unstable()
+	 * provides.
+	 */
+	if (unlikely(pmd_trans_unstable(pmd)))
 		return 0;
 	/*
 	 * A regular pmd is established and it can't morph into a huge pmd

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web