Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1347070 > unrolled thread

Re: [1/4] powerpc/mm: Clean up error handling for htab_remove_mapping

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [1/4] powerpc/mm: Clean up error handling for htab_remove_mapping Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-03-01 23:30 +0100

#1347070 — Re: [1/4] powerpc/mm: Clean up error handling for htab_remove_mapping

On Tue, 2016-09-02 at 03:32:40 UTC, David Gibson wrote:
> Currently, the only error that htab_remove_mapping() can report is -EINVAL,
> if removal of bolted HPTEs isn't implemeted for this platform.  We make
> a few clean ups to the handling of this:
> 
>  * EINVAL isn't really the right code - there's nothing wrong with the
>    function's arguments - use ENODEV instead
>  * We were also printing a warning message, but that's a decision better
>    left up to the callers, so remove it
>  * One caller is vmemmap_remove_mapping(), which will just BUG_ON() on
>    error, making the warning message redundant, so no change is needed
>    there.
>  * The other caller is remove_section_mapping().  This is called in the
>    memory hot remove path at a point after vmemmap_remove_mapping() so
>    if hpte_removebolted isn't implemented, we'd expect to have already
>    BUG()ed anyway.  Put a WARN_ON() here, in lieu of a printk() since this
>    really shouldn't be happening.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/abd0a0e7914a1137973119ac3b

cheers

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web