Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1345535 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy.

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy. Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@collabora.com> - 2016-02-29 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy. Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-02-29 17:20 +0100

#1345535 — Re: [PATCHv2 0/2] fs/pstore: Use memcpy_from/toio() instead of memcpy.

Hi all,

On 18/02/16 00:00, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
>>> Tony, are you able to pull these?
>>
>> I've been distracted ... I need to dig into the pile of pending pstore patches.
>>
>> Was there a consensus on the device tree ones? I saw a "you shouldn't do that",
>> and a "but it's really convenient and doesn't hurt anyone else" exchange.
>
> Honestly, I'm a bit unclear where the DT stuff stands... that thread
> got long. :)
>
> -Kees
>

There are more pstore related patches in these patch series, would be 
good if you have a chance to look at these also, thanks.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/16/109

-Enric

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1345946

[From the right account and in text format this time]

On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Enric Balletbo i Serra
<enric.balletbo@collabora.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 18/02/16 00:00, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Tony, are you able to pull these?
>>>
>>>
>>> I've been distracted ... I need to dig into the pile of pending pstore
>>> patches.
>>>
>>> Was there a consensus on the device tree ones? I saw a "you shouldn't do
>>> that",
>>> and a "but it's really convenient and doesn't hurt anyone else" exchange.
>>
>>
>> Honestly, I'm a bit unclear where the DT stuff stands... that thread
>> got long. :)
>>
>> -Kees
>>
>
> There are more pstore related patches in these patch series, would be good
> if you have a chance to look at these also, thanks.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/16/109

Yeah, those are platform/chrome patches that I'll look at and pick up this week.


-Olof

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web