Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1346290 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-01 03:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-01 10:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> - 2016-03-01 03:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-01 04:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> - 2016-03-01 04:40 +0100
RE: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> - 2016-03-01 05:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2016-03-01 06:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2016-03-01 10:00 +0100
| From | Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 03:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler |
| Message-ID | <r7HLs-2tR-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
commit 58c5661f2144 ("panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even
if looping in NMI context") introduced nmi_panic() which prevents
concurrent/recursive execution of panic(). It also saves registers
for the crash dump on x86.
ipmi_watchdog driver can call panic() from NMI handler, so replace
it with nmi_panic().
Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
index 096f0ce..4facc75 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
@@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ ipmi_nmi(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
the timer. So do so. */
pretimeout_since_last_heartbeat = 1;
if (atomic_inc_and_test(&preop_panic_excl))
- panic(PFX "pre-timeout");
+ nmi_panic(regs, PFX "pre-timeout");
}
return NMI_HANDLED;
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 04:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7IHw-33a-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1346290 |
On 02/29/2016 05:50 PM, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> commit 58c5661f2144 ("panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even
> if looping in NMI context") introduced nmi_panic() which prevents
> concurrent/recursive execution of panic(). It also saves registers
> for the crash dump on x86.
>
> ipmi_watchdog driver can call panic() from NMI handler, so replace
> it with nmi_panic().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
> Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> index 096f0ce..4facc75 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ ipmi_nmi(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
> the timer. So do so. */
> pretimeout_since_last_heartbeat = 1;
> if (atomic_inc_and_test(&preop_panic_excl))
> - panic(PFX "pre-timeout");
> + nmi_panic(regs, PFX "pre-timeout");
> }
>
> return NMI_HANDLED;
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 04:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7Jke-3EW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1346290 |
Sure, this is a good idea.
Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Note that nmi_panic() came in commit 1717f2096b5 (panic, x86: Fix
re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI) and then the regs field
was added in the commit you reference.
Do you want me to add this to the IPMI queue or do you have another
way to get this patch into the kernel?
-corey
On 02/29/2016 07:50 PM, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> commit 58c5661f2144 ("panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even
> if looping in NMI context") introduced nmi_panic() which prevents
> concurrent/recursive execution of panic(). It also saves registers
> for the crash dump on x86.
>
> ipmi_watchdog driver can call panic() from NMI handler, so replace
> it with nmi_panic().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
> Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> index 096f0ce..4facc75 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ ipmi_nmi(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
> the timer. So do so. */
> pretimeout_since_last_heartbeat = 1;
> if (atomic_inc_and_test(&preop_panic_excl))
> - panic(PFX "pre-timeout");
> + nmi_panic(regs, PFX "pre-timeout");
> }
>
> return NMI_HANDLED;
>
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 05:30 +0100 |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH 2/3] ipmi/watchdog: Use nmi_panic() when kernel panics in NMI handler |
| Message-ID | <r7K6B-4aZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1346344 |
Hi Corey, Thanks for the review. > Sure, this is a good idea. > > Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> > > Note that nmi_panic() came in commit 1717f2096b5 (panic, x86: Fix > re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI) and then the regs field > was added in the commit you reference. Yes. So, I'll change the description to more proper one. > Do you want me to add this to the IPMI queue or do you have another > way to get this patch into the kernel? I don't have another way, and I don't know how cross-subsystem patch set should be handled. I think it would be better this patch set is managed by one person because both PATCH 2/3 and 3/3 depend on 1/3. Thanks, -- Hidehiro Kawai Hitachi, Ltd. Research & Development Group
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 06:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7KT0-4Ga-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1346355 |
On 02/29/2016 08:23 PM, 河合英宏 / KAWAI,HIDEHIRO wrote: > Hi Corey, > > Thanks for the review. > >> Sure, this is a good idea. >> >> Acked-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> >> >> Note that nmi_panic() came in commit 1717f2096b5 (panic, x86: Fix >> re-entrance problem due to panic on NMI) and then the regs field >> was added in the commit you reference. > > Yes. So, I'll change the description to more proper one. > >> Do you want me to add this to the IPMI queue or do you have another >> way to get this patch into the kernel? > > I don't have another way, and I don't know how cross-subsystem > patch set should be handled. > > I think it would be better this patch set is managed by one person > because both PATCH 2/3 and 3/3 depend on 1/3. > We'll need an Ack from someone with authority over kernel/panic.c. If someone sends an Ack, the series can go through IPMI (or watchdog). It might be easier though if Andrew would take the entire series. Guenter
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-01 10:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r7OjU-6MP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1346290 |
On Tue 01-03-16 10:50:39, Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> commit 58c5661f2144 ("panic, x86: Allow CPUs to save registers even
> if looping in NMI context") introduced nmi_panic() which prevents
> concurrent/recursive execution of panic(). It also saves registers
> for the crash dump on x86.
>
> ipmi_watchdog driver can call panic() from NMI handler, so replace
> it with nmi_panic().
>
> Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@hitachi.com>
> Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
> Cc: openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> index 096f0ce..4facc75 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
> @@ -1140,7 +1140,7 @@ ipmi_nmi(unsigned int val, struct pt_regs *regs)
> the timer. So do so. */
> pretimeout_since_last_heartbeat = 1;
> if (atomic_inc_and_test(&preop_panic_excl))
> - panic(PFX "pre-timeout");
> + nmi_panic(regs, PFX "pre-timeout");
> }
>
> return NMI_HANDLED;
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web