Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1344319 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-26 16:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-26 16:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RFC v2 4/7] asm/sections: add a generic push_section_tbl() Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> - 2016-02-26 16:00 +0100
| From | Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 16:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v2 4/7] asm/sections: add a generic push_section_tbl() |
| Message-ID | <r6s26-4LU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 06:55:05PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/19/16 13:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >> I think the \n\t is unnecessary. > > > > Super! I wonder if we we can just use this on s390 as well without it pooping? > > I ask as this would set a precedent. > > > > Ask Heike, but I think just ; or \n ought be be fine. I do not know of > *any* case where \t at the end of a string would ever be necessary, and > it would *always* be possible to replace it with a space in a pinch. \n should be fine on s390.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web