Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1344237 > unrolled thread

Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: clocksource: make ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER selectable

Started byGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
First post2016-02-26 14:10 +0100
Last post2016-02-26 16:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: clocksource: make ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER selectable Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-02-26 14:10 +0100
    Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: clocksource: make ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER selectable Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> - 2016-02-26 16:30 +0100

#1344237 — Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: clocksource: make ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER selectable

FromGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date2016-02-26 14:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] ARM: clocksource: make ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER selectable
Message-ID<r6qjD-3Lu-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 02/05/2016 01:39 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 15:14:47 -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote:
>> Hi Soeren,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann
>> <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
>>
>>> But with this change the 'if !CPU_FREQ' becomes obsolete.
>> I'm confused, could you explain that statement? You don't want people
>> accidentally running with GT when CPU_FREQ is on, right?
> 
> Correct. But with this Kconfig rework you can just deselect it in
> Kconfig. The generic HAVE_GT could always be selected.
> 


Don't know whom should i ask - but what will be the final conclusion here?
Can it be merged?

-- 
regards,
-grygorii

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1344333

FromSören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Date2016-02-26 16:30 +0100
Message-ID<r6sv7-5gy-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1344237
On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 15:03:19 +0200, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 01:39 AM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 15:14:47 -0800, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> >> Hi Soeren,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Sören Brinkmann
> >> <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> But with this change the 'if !CPU_FREQ' becomes obsolete.
> >> I'm confused, could you explain that statement? You don't want people
> >> accidentally running with GT when CPU_FREQ is on, right?
> > 
> > Correct. But with this Kconfig rework you can just deselect it in
> > Kconfig. The generic HAVE_GT could always be selected.
> > 
> 
> 
> Don't know whom should i ask - but what will be the final conclusion here?
> Can it be merged?

I think we don't break anything either way. Would just be some
additional clean up to get rid of that mentioned constraint (which
doesn't really work well anyway in the multi-arch kernel). So, no real
objections to merging it from my side.

	Thanks,
	Sören

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web