Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1343615 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree |
| Message-ID | <r6eiu-3m0-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
between commit:
2da897e51d7f ("bpf: fix csum setting for bpf_set_tunnel_key")
from the net tree and commit:
d5a3b1f69186 ("bpf: introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_STACK_TRACE")
from the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 5df4881dea7b,6496f98d3d68..000000000000
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@@ -292,9 -321,12 +321,15 @@@ enum bpf_func_id
/* BPF_FUNC_skb_set_tunnel_key and BPF_FUNC_skb_get_tunnel_key flags. */
#define BPF_F_TUNINFO_IPV6 (1ULL << 0)
+/* BPF_FUNC_skb_set_tunnel_key flags. */
+#define BPF_F_ZERO_CSUM_TX (1ULL << 1)
+
+ /* BPF_FUNC_get_stackid flags. */
+ #define BPF_F_SKIP_FIELD_MASK 0xffULL
+ #define BPF_F_USER_STACK (1ULL << 8)
+ #define BPF_F_FAST_STACK_CMP (1ULL << 9)
+ #define BPF_F_REUSE_STACKID (1ULL << 10)
+
/* user accessible mirror of in-kernel sk_buff.
* new fields can only be added to the end of this structure
*/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-26 01:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r6eiu-3m0-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1343615 |
On 02/26/2016 01:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: [...] > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action > is required). Looks good to me, thanks Stephen! Best, Daniel
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web