Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1343063 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC Board

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC  Board Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org> - 2016-02-25 11:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic  DE0-NANO-SoC  Board Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de> - 2016-02-25 11:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC Board Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org> - 2016-02-26 00:40 +0100

#1343063 — [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC Board

From: Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org>

Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups are
not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.

Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
 arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts     | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
index 72e2c5a..d1f7803 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ synology	Synology, Inc.
 tbs	TBS Technologies
 tcl	Toby Churchill Ltd.
 technologic	Technologic Systems
+terasic	Terasic Inc.
 thine	THine Electronics, Inc.
 ti	Texas Instruments
 tlm	Trusted Logic Mobility
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
index afea364..704aa9d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
 
 / {
 	model = "Terasic DE-0(Atlas)";
-	compatible = "altr,socfpga-cyclone5", "altr,socfpga";
+	compatible = "terasic,de0-nano-soc","altr,socfpga-cyclone5", "altr,socfpga";
 
 	chosen {
 		bootargs = "earlyprintk";
-- 
1.9.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1343095 — Re: [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC Board

Hi Tim!

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
> From: Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org>
> 
> Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for respective board.
> Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some board specific fixups are
> not apropriate for board of the same platform ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5").
> The same aproach is taken with the EBV-Socrates board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts     | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> index 72e2c5a..d1f7803 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ synology	Synology, Inc.
>  tbs	TBS Technologies
>  tcl	Toby Churchill Ltd.
>  technologic	Technologic Systems
> +terasic	Terasic Inc.
>  thine	THine Electronics, Inc.
>  ti	Texas Instruments
>  tlm	Trusted Logic Mobility

You should IMHO split this up in two patches.
First patch: add terasic

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> index afea364..704aa9d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
>  
>  / {
>  	model = "Terasic DE-0(Atlas)";
> -	compatible = "altr,socfpga-cyclone5", "altr,socfpga";
> +	compatible = "terasic,de0-nano-soc","altr,socfpga-cyclone5", "altr,socfpga";

Second patch: this.

>  
>  	chosen {
>  		bootargs = "earlyprintk";

The naming of this board still confuses me though.
It has 3 different names now:

	- de0_sockit.dts
	- Terasic DE-0(Atlas)
	- de0-nano-soc

And according to Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC is the same as Atlas-SoC with a different software?!
So all three names are actually correct ?! Weird.

Regards,
Steffen

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1343583 — Re: [PATCH v2] dts: add specific compatible type for Terasic DE0-NANO-SoC Board

Hi Dinh

On Thursday 25 February 2016 10:56:28 Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 02/25/2016 04:38 AM, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> > Hi Tim!
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Tim Sander wrote:
> >> From: Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org>
> >> 
> >> Add a more specific compatible string:"terasic,de0-nano-soc" for
> >> respective board. Background: when checking for bootspec entries, some
> >> board specific fixups are not apropriate for board of the same platform
> >> ("altr,socfpga-cyclone5"). The same aproach is taken with the
> >> EBV-Socrates board.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Tim Sander <tim@krieglstein.org>
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt | 1 +
> >>  arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts     | 2 +-
> >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt index
> >> 72e2c5a..d1f7803 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> >> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ synology	Synology, Inc.
> >> 
> >>  tbs	TBS Technologies
> >>  tcl	Toby Churchill Ltd.
> >>  technologic	Technologic Systems
> >> 
> >> +terasic	Terasic Inc.
> >> 
> >>  thine	THine Electronics, Inc.
> >>  ti	Texas Instruments
> >>  tlm	Trusted Logic Mobility
> > 
> > You should IMHO split this up in two patches.
> > First patch: add terasic
> 
> That's right. That patch will go through the DTS maintainer's tree.
Ah well for such a simple patch it turns out more complicated than thought :-)
Will do as soon as there is agreement on a name which does not seem that 
easy...
> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts index
> >> afea364..704aa9d 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_sockit.dts
> >> @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
> >> 
> >>  / {
> >>  
> >>  	model = "Terasic DE-0(Atlas)";
> >> 
> >> -	compatible = "altr,socfpga-cyclone5", "altr,socfpga";
> >> +	compatible = "terasic,de0-nano-soc","altr,socfpga-cyclone5",
> >> "altr,socfpga";
> So perhaps, "terasic,de0-sockit"?
> 
> > Second patch: this.
> 
> And I can take this one.
> 
> >>  	chosen {
> >>  	
> >>  		bootargs = "earlyprintk";
> > 
> > The naming of this board still confuses me though.
> > 
> > It has 3 different names now:
> > 	- de0_sockit.dts
> > 	- Terasic DE-0(Atlas)
> > 	- de0-nano-soc
> > 
> > And according to Terasic DE0-Nano-SoC is the same as Atlas-SoC with a
> > different software?! So all three names are actually correct ?! Weird.
> 
> I had a hard time understanding this myself. But from what I gather
> from[1], I just name the file de0_sockit.
As far as i remember there are different de0 and different sockit boards, so 
the name does not seem to be as concise? I don't care but i would say that
de0-nano-soc is the most concise and easier to search for than atlas which
might turn up more false postives?

But as long as there is a more selective name than cyclone5 everthing is fine
with me.

Best regards
Tim

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web